Tan Jie, Ngwayi James Reeves Mbori, Ding Zhaohan, Zhou Yufa, Li Ming, Chen Yujie, Hu Bingtao, Liu Jinping, Porter Daniel Edward
School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Medical Department, Linyi Tumour Hospital, Linyi, 276002, China.
Patient Saf Surg. 2021 Jan 6;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00276-0.
Ten years after the introduction of the Chinese Ministry of Health (MoH) version of Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) we wished to assess the ongoing influence of the World Health Organisation (WHO) SSC by observing all three checklist components during elective surgical procedures in China, as well as survey operating room staff and surgeons more widely about the WHO SSC.
A questionnaire was designed to gain authentic views on the WHO SSC. We also conducted a prospective cross-sectional study at five level 3 hospitals. Local data collectors were trained to document specific item performance. Adverse events which delayed the operation were recorded as well as the individuals leading or participating in the three SSC components.
A total of 846 operating room staff and surgeons from 138 hospitals representing every mainland province responded to the survey. There was widespread acceptance of the checklist and its value in improving patient safety. 860 operations were observed for SSC compliance. Overall compliance was 79.8%. Compliance in surgeon-dependent items of the 'time-out' component reduced when it was nurse-led (p < 0.0001). WHO SSC interventions which are omitted from the MoH SSC continued to be discussed over half the time. Overall adverse events rate was 2.7%. One site had near 100% compliance in association with a circulating inspection team which had power of sanction.
The WHO SSC remains a powerful tool for surgical patient safety in China. Cultural changes in nursing assertiveness and surgeon-led teamwork and checklist ownership are the key elements for improving compliance. Standardised audits are required to monitor and ensure checklist compliance.
在中国卫生部(MoH)版手术安全核查表(SSC)推行十年后,我们希望通过观察中国择期手术过程中核查表的所有三个组成部分,以及更广泛地调查手术室工作人员和外科医生对世界卫生组织(WHO)SSC的看法,来评估WHO SSC的持续影响。
设计了一份问卷以获取对WHO SSC的真实看法。我们还在五家三级医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。当地数据收集人员接受培训,以记录特定项目的执行情况。记录导致手术延迟的不良事件以及主导或参与SSC三个组成部分的人员。
来自代表中国大陆每个省份的138家医院的846名手术室工作人员和外科医生对调查做出了回应。核查表及其在提高患者安全方面的价值得到了广泛认可。观察了860例手术的SSC合规情况。总体合规率为79.8%。当由护士主导时,“暂停”部分中依赖外科医生的项目的合规率降低(p < 0.0001)。卫生部版SSC中未包含的WHO SSC干预措施仍有超过一半的时间在讨论。总体不良事件发生率为2.7%。一个机构在有制裁权的巡回检查小组的协助下,合规率接近100%。
WHO SSC仍然是中国保障手术患者安全的有力工具。护理自信、外科医生主导的团队合作及核查表所有权方面的文化变革是提高合规性的关键要素。需要进行标准化审核以监测并确保核查表的合规性。