Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, UK.
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 18 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 7;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01355-y.
Nearly 40% of parents with children aged 6 to 17 months consult a healthcare professional when their child has a high temperature. Clinical guidelines recommend temperature measurement in these children, but little is known about parents' experiences of and beliefs about temperature measurement. This study aimed to explore parents' concerns and beliefs about temperature measurement in children.
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted from May 2017 to June 2018 with 21 parents of children aged 4 months to 5.5 years, who were purposively sampled from the METRIC study (a method comparison study comparing non-contact infrared thermometers to axillary and tympanic thermometers in acutely ill children). Data analysis followed a thematic approach.
Parents described the importance of being able to detect fever, in particular high fevers, and how this then influenced their actions. The concept of "accuracy" was valued by parents but the aspects of performance which were felt to reflect accuracy varied. Parents used numerical values of temperature in four main ways: determining precision of the thermometer on repeat measures, detecting a "bad" fever, as an indication to administer antipyretics, or monitoring response to treatment. Family and social networks, the internet, and medical professionals and resources, were all key sources of advice for parents regarding fever, and guiding thermometer choice.
Temperature measurement in children has diagnostic value but can either empower, or cause anxiety and practical challenges for parents. This represents an opportunity for both improved communication between parents and healthcare professionals, and technological development, to support parents to manage febrile illness with greater confidence in the home.
6-17 月龄儿童的家长中,近 40%在孩子发热时会咨询医疗保健专业人员。临床指南建议对这些儿童进行体温测量,但对于家长在儿童体温测量方面的体验和信念知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨家长对儿童体温测量的关注和信念。
2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 6 月,采用半结构式定性访谈,对 21 名 4 月龄至 5.5 岁儿童的家长进行了访谈,这些家长是从 METRIC 研究中(一项比较非接触式红外体温计与腋温和鼓膜体温计在急性病儿童中应用的方法比较研究)中按目的抽样的。数据分析采用主题方法。
家长描述了能够检测发热,特别是高热的重要性,以及这如何影响他们的行为。家长重视“准确性”的概念,但认为反映准确性的性能方面有所不同。家长以四种主要方式使用体温的数值:确定温度计在重复测量时的精度,检测“不好”的发热,作为使用退烧药的指征,或监测治疗反应。家庭和社会网络、互联网以及医疗专业人员和资源都是家长获取有关发热的建议以及指导体温计选择的关键来源。
儿童体温测量具有诊断价值,但可能会增强家长的信心,也可能会引起家长的焦虑和实际挑战。这为家长和医疗保健专业人员之间进行更好的沟通以及技术发展提供了机会,以支持家长在家中更有信心地管理发热性疾病。