Cheema A S, Lai C T, Dymock M, Rae A, Geddes D T, Payne M S, Stinson L F
School of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Centre for Applied Statistics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
J Appl Microbiol. 2021 Aug;131(2):988-995. doi: 10.1111/jam.14998. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
To investigate the impact of expression mode: electric breast pump or hand expression, and timing of sample collection: pre- and post-milk ejection on human milk (HM) bacterial DNA profiles.
Three HM samples from the same breast were collected from 30 breastfeeding mothers: a pre-milk ejection pump-expressed sample (pre-pump), a post-milk ejection pump-expressed sample (post-pump) and a post-milk ejection hand-expressed sample (post-hand). Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to assess milk bacterial DNA profiles. Bacterial profiles did not differ significantly based on mode of expression nor timing of sample collection. No significant differences were detected in the relative abundance of any OTUs based on expression condition (pre-pump/ post-pump and post-pump/post-hand) with univariate linear mixed-effects regression analyses (all P-values > 0·01; α = 0·01). Similarly, no difference in richness was observed between sample types (number of observed OTUs: post-pump/post-hand P = 0·13; pre-pump/post-pump P = 0. 45).
Bacterial DNA profiles of HM did not differ according to either expression method or timing of sample collection.
Hand or pump expression can be utilized to collect samples for microbiome studies. This has implications for the design of future HM microbiome studies.
研究表达方式(电动吸奶器或手动挤奶)以及样本采集时间(喷乳前和喷乳后)对人乳(HM)细菌DNA谱的影响。
从30名母乳喂养的母亲同一侧乳房采集三份HM样本:一份喷乳前用吸奶器吸出的样本(吸奶器前)、一份喷乳后用吸奶器吸出的样本(吸奶器后)和一份喷乳后手动挤出的样本(手动后)。使用全长16S rRNA基因测序评估乳汁细菌DNA谱。细菌谱在表达方式和样本采集时间方面均无显著差异。单变量线性混合效应回归分析未检测到基于表达条件(吸奶器前/吸奶器后和吸奶器后/手动后)的任何操作分类单元(OTU)相对丰度有显著差异(所有P值>0.01;α = 0.01)。同样,样本类型之间在丰富度上也未观察到差异(观察到的OTU数量:吸奶器后/手动后P = 0.13;吸奶器前/吸奶器后P = 0.45)。
HM的细菌DNA谱在表达方法或样本采集时间上均无差异。
手动或用吸奶器挤奶均可用于采集微生物组研究的样本。这对未来HM微生物组研究的设计具有启示意义。