Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Vantaa, Finland (SÅ, JN).
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (SÅ, JN).
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Mar-Apr;26(2):263-271. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1873472. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
While prehospital blood transfusion (PHBT) for trauma patients has been established in many services, the literature on PHBT use for nontrauma patients is limited. We aimed to describe and compare nontrauma and trauma patients receiving PHBT who had similar hemodynamic triggers. We analyzed 3.5 years of registry data from a single prehospital critical care unit. The PHBT protocol included two packed red blood cell units and was later completed with two freeze-dried plasma units. The transfusion triggers were a strong clinical suspicion of massive hemorrhage and systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or absent radial pulse. Thirty-six nontrauma patients and 96 trauma patients received PHBT. The nontrauma group had elderly patients (median 65 [interquartile range, IQR, 56-73] vs 37 [IQR 25-57] years, p < 0.0001) and included patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 15; 42%), vascular catastrophes (n = 9; 25%), postoperative bleeding (n = 6; 17%), obstetrical bleeding (n = 4; 11%) and other (n = 2; 6%). Cardiac arrest occurred in nine (25%) nontrauma and in 15 (16%) trauma patients. Of these, 5 (56%) and 10 (67%) survived to hospital admission and 3 (33%) and 2 (13%) to hospital discharge. On admission, the nontrauma patients had lower hemoglobin (median 95 [84-119] vs 124 [108-133], p < 0.0001), higher pH (median 7.40 [7.27-7.44] vs 7.30 [7.19-7.36], p = 0.0015) and lower plasma thromboplastin time (median 55 [45-81] vs 72 [58-86], p = 0.0261) than the trauma patients. We identified four nontrauma patient groups in need of PHBT, and the patients appeared to be seriously ill. Efficacy of prehospital transfusion in nontrauma patients should be evaluated futher in becoming studies.
虽然在许多服务中已经建立了创伤患者的院前输血(PHBT),但关于 PHBT 用于非创伤患者的文献有限。我们旨在描述和比较接受 PHBT 的非创伤和创伤患者,这些患者具有相似的血流动力学触发因素。我们分析了来自一个单一的院前重症监护单位的 3.5 年登记数据。PHBT 方案包括两个单位的浓缩红细胞,后来用两个单位的冻干血浆完成。输血触发因素是强烈的大量出血临床怀疑和收缩压低于 90mmHg 或桡动脉脉搏消失。36 名非创伤患者和 96 名创伤患者接受了 PHBT。非创伤组为老年患者(中位数 65[四分位距[IQR],56-73]岁),包括胃肠道出血患者(n=15;42%),血管灾难患者(n=9;25%),术后出血患者(n=6;17%),产科出血患者(n=4;11%)和其他(n=2;6%)。9 名(25%)非创伤患者和 15 名(16%)创伤患者发生心脏骤停。其中,5 名(56%)和 10 名(67%)幸存者入院,3 名(33%)和 2 名(13%)幸存者出院。入院时,非创伤患者的血红蛋白水平较低(中位数 95[84-119]vs 124[108-133],p<0.0001),pH 值较高(中位数 7.40[7.27-7.44]vs 7.30[7.19-7.36],p=0.0015),血浆凝血酶原时间较短(中位数 55[45-81]vs 72[58-86],p=0.0261),而非创伤患者的血小板功能检测时间较长。我们确定了需要 PHBT 的 4 组非创伤患者,这些患者似乎病情严重。需要进一步评估非创伤患者院前输血的疗效,以开展研究。