Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, Brescia, Italy.
Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):815-824. doi: 10.1055/a-1308-1297. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Primary colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are the most commonly used colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) might be an alternative. Data on the performance of CCE as a CRC screening tool in a screening population remain scarce. This is the first systematic review to provide an overview of the applicability of CCE as a CRC screening tool.
A systematic search was conducted of literature published up to September 2020. Studies reporting on CRC screening by second-generation CCE in an average-risk screening population were included.
582 studies were identified and 13 were included, comprising 2485 patients. Eight studies used CCE as a filter test after a positive FIT result and five studies used CCE for primary screening. The polyp detection rate of CCE was 24 % - 74 %. For polyps > 6 mm, sensitivity of CCE was 79 % - 96 % and specificity was 66 % - 97 %. For polyps ≥ 10 mm, sensitivity of CCE was 84 % - 97 %, which was superior to computed tomographic colonography (CTC). The CRC detection rate for completed CCEs was 93 % (25/27). Bowel preparation was adequate in 70 % - 92 % of examinations, and completion rates varied from 57 % to 92 %, depending on the booster used. No CCE-related complications were described.
CCE appeared to be a safe and effective tool for the detection of CRC and polyps in a screening setting. Accuracy was comparable to colonoscopy and superior to CTC, making CCE a good alternative to colonoscopy in CRC screening programs, although completion rates require improvement.
结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)是最常用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的方法。胶囊内镜检查(CCE)可能是一种替代方法。关于 CCE 作为筛查人群中 CRC 筛查工具的性能的数据仍然很少。这是第一篇系统综述,提供了 CCE 作为 CRC 筛查工具的适用性概述。
对截至 2020 年 9 月发表的文献进行了系统检索。纳入了在一般风险筛查人群中使用第二代 CCE 进行 CRC 筛查的研究。
共确定了 582 项研究,其中 13 项研究纳入了 2485 例患者。8 项研究将 CCE 作为阳性 FIT 结果后的筛选试验,5 项研究将 CCE 用于初级筛查。CCE 的息肉检出率为 24%-74%。对于>6mm 的息肉,CCE 的敏感性为 79%-96%,特异性为 66%-97%。对于≥10mm 的息肉,CCE 的敏感性为 84%-97%,优于计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)。完成的 CCE 的 CRC 检出率为 93%(25/27)。肠道准备在 70%-92%的检查中是充分的,完成率因使用的助推器而异,从 57%到 92%不等。没有描述与 CCE 相关的并发症。
CCE 似乎是一种安全有效的工具,可用于筛查人群中 CRC 和息肉的检测。其准确性与结肠镜检查相当,优于 CTC,使 CCE 成为 CRC 筛查计划中结肠镜检查的良好替代方法,尽管完成率需要提高。