Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
J Immunol Res. 2020 Dec 8;2020:5618786. doi: 10.1155/2020/5618786. eCollection 2020.
Inflammation has been linked with cancer, but whether it is part of the problem or part of the solution remains to be a matter of debate in breast cancer. Our group and others have demonstrated that inflammation aggravates cancer progression; however, some claim that inflammation may support immune cell infiltration and suppress cancer. We defined the gene set variation analysis of the Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark inflammatory response gene set as the inflammatory pathway score and analyzed 3632 tumors in total from 4 breast cancer cohorts (METABRIC, TCGA, GSE25066, and GSE21094). In the whole breast cancer cohort, high-score tumors were associated with aggressive clinical characteristics, such as worse disease specific survival, higher Nottingham histological grade, and younger age. Inflammatory score was significantly higher in triple-negative (TNBC) as well as basal and normal subtypes compared with the other subtypes, which suggest that the detrimental effect of high level of inflammation may be because it includes a more aggressive subtype. On the contrary, high score within TNBC was significantly associated with better survival. TNBC with high score enriched not only IFN-, IFN- response, IL-2/STAT5 signaling, Allograft rejection, Complement, p53 pathway, Reactive Oxygen, and Apoptosis but also TNF- signaling, IL6-JAK-STAT signaling, TGF- signaling, Coagulation, Angiogenesis, EMT, signaling, and PI3K-AKT-MTOR signaling gene sets. High score was associated with mainly favorable anticancerous immune cell infiltration as well as Leukocyte fraction, TIL regional fraction, Lymphocyte infiltration, IFN- response, TGF- response, and cytolytic activity scores. Although the inflammatory pathway score was not associated with neoadjuvant treatment response, it associated with expressions of immune checkpoint molecules. In conclusion, inflammation was associated with worse outcome in the whole breast cancer cohort, but with better outcome in TNBC, which was associated with favorable anticancerous immune response and immune cell infiltrations.
炎症与癌症有关,但它是癌症问题的一部分还是解决方案的一部分,在乳腺癌中仍存在争议。我们的研究小组和其他研究小组已经证明,炎症会加重癌症的进展;然而,也有人声称炎症可能支持免疫细胞浸润并抑制癌症。我们将分子特征数据库标志性炎症反应基因集的基因集变异分析定义为炎症途径评分,并对来自 4 个乳腺癌队列(METABRIC、TCGA、GSE25066 和 GSE21094)的 3632 个肿瘤进行了分析。在整个乳腺癌队列中,高分肿瘤与侵袭性临床特征相关,例如疾病特异性生存率较差、Nottingham 组织学分级较高和年龄较小。与其他亚型相比,三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)以及基底和正常亚型的炎症评分显著更高,这表明高水平炎症的不利影响可能是因为它包括更具侵袭性的亚型。相反,TNBC 中的高分与更好的生存显著相关。高分的 TNBC 不仅富含 IFN-、IFN-反应、IL-2/STAT5 信号、同种异体移植排斥、补体、p53 途径、活性氧和细胞凋亡,还富含 TNF-信号、IL6-JAK-STAT 信号、TGF-信号、凝血、血管生成、上皮间质转化、PI3K-AKT-MTOR 信号和其他信号。高分与主要有利于抗癌免疫细胞浸润以及白细胞分数、TIL 区域分数、淋巴细胞浸润、IFN-反应、TGF-反应和细胞毒性活性评分相关。虽然炎症途径评分与新辅助治疗反应无关,但与免疫检查点分子的表达相关。总之,炎症与整个乳腺癌队列的不良预后相关,但与 TNBC 的良好预后相关,这与有利的抗癌免疫反应和免疫细胞浸润有关。