Suppr超能文献

重新评估孕周作为预测早产的指标。

Re-evaluation of gestational age as a predictor for subsequent preterm birth.

机构信息

Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Information Services Department, THL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245935. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate gestational age as a predictor of subsequent preterm birth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective birth cohort study to evaluate gestational age as a predictor of subsequent preterm birth. Participants were mothers who gave birth to their first two children in Western Australia, 1980-2015 (N = 255,151 mothers). For each week of final gestational age of the first birth, we calculated relative risks (RR) and absolute risks (AR) of subsequent preterm birth defined as final gestational age before 28, 32, 34 and <37 weeks. Risks were unadjusted to preserve risk factor profiles at each week of gestation.

RESULTS

The relative risks of second birth before 28, 32, and 34 weeks' gestation were all approximately twenty times higher for mothers whose first birth had a gestational age of 22 to 30 weeks compared to those whose first birth was at 40 weeks' gestation. The absolute risks of second birth before 28, 32, and 34 weeks' gestation for these mothers had upper confidence limits that were all less than 16.74%. The absolute risk of second birth before 37 weeks was highest at 32.11% (95% CI: 30.27, 34.02) for mothers whose first birth was 22 to 30 weeks' gestation. For all gestational ages of the first child, the lowest quartile and median gestational age of the second birth were at least 36 weeks and at least 38 weeks, respectively. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were all below 35%.

CONCLUSION

Relative risks of early subsequent birth increased markedly with decreasing gestational age of the first birth. However, absolute risks of clinically significant preterm birth (<28 weeks, <32 weeks, <34 weeks), sensitivity and positive predictive values remained low. Early gestational age is a strong risk factor but a poor predictor of subsequent preterm birth.

摘要

背景

评估胎龄作为预测后续早产的指标。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性出生队列研究,旨在评估胎龄作为预测后续早产的指标。参与者为 1980 年至 2015 年在西澳大利亚首次生育头两胎的母亲(N=255151 名母亲)。对于第一胎的最后孕周每增加一周,我们计算随后早产(定义为最后孕周<28 周、<32 周、<34 周和<37 周)的相对风险(RR)和绝对风险(AR)。为了保留每个孕周的风险因素特征,风险未进行调整。

结果

与第一胎在 40 周时出生的母亲相比,第一胎在 22 至 30 周时出生的母亲,第二胎在 28 周、32 周和 34 周前分娩的相对风险均约为 20 倍。对于这些母亲,第二胎在 28 周、32 周和 34 周前分娩的绝对风险上限均小于 16.74%。对于第一胎在 22 至 30 周时出生的母亲,第二胎在 37 周前分娩的绝对风险最高,为 32.11%(95%CI:30.27,34.02)。对于所有第一胎的胎龄,第二胎的最低四分位数和中位数胎龄均至少为 36 周和至少 38 周。敏感度和阳性预测值均低于 35%。

结论

随着第一胎分娩时胎龄的降低,后续早期分娩的相对风险显著增加。然而,临床显著早产(<28 周、<32 周、<34 周)的绝对风险、敏感度和阳性预测值仍然较低。早期胎龄是一个强有力的风险因素,但对后续早产的预测能力较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62f/7822520/7713d3f29d8c/pone.0245935.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验