Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Postgraduate Studies, Universidad Autónoma del Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Mar;24 Suppl 1:103-112. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12470. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
The aim of this systematic review is to assess the treatment effects (amount of distalization, distal tipping and vertical movement) of buccally versus palatally placed temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) on maxillary first molars during distalization.
Medline and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective cohort studies on maxillary molar distalization using TSADs in patients with Class II malocclusion. After study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, meta-analyses were performed for the amount of distalization, distal tipping and intrusion of first molars.
Nine studies (2 RCTs and 7 prospective studies) were included. The risk of bias of the RCTs was low to unclear. The non-randomized studies were of moderate quality. In five studies, the TSADs were placed in the infrazygomatic process while in two studies, they were placed in the buccal inter-radicular spaces, and in two studies, they were placed in the midpalatal region. The first molar distalization was 2.75 mm when buccal inter-radicular TSADs were used, but 4.07 and 4.17 mm with palatal and infrazgomatic TSADs. The palatal appliances were associated with 11.17° of distal tipping of the first molar while infrazygomatic and buccal inter-radicular TSADs resulted in 3.99° and 1.70° of tipping, respectively.
Inter-radicular TSADs resulted in less distal tipping but also in less distalization. Palatal TSAD-supported appliances showed the greatest amount of distal tipping. Further RCTs or prospective studies on the effect of various designs of TSAD-supported distalization are warranted.
本系统评价旨在评估颊侧和腭侧临时骨锚固装置 (TSAD) 在远移上颌第一磨牙时的治疗效果(远移量、远中倾斜和垂直移动)。
截至 2020 年 9 月,我们在 Medline 和 Scopus 数据库中检索了使用 TSAD 治疗安氏 II 类错牙合患者上颌磨牙远移的随机对照试验 (RCT) 和非随机前瞻性队列研究。在研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,我们对第一磨牙的远移量、远中倾斜和内倾进行了荟萃分析。
共纳入 9 项研究(2 项 RCT 和 7 项前瞻性研究)。RCT 的偏倚风险为低至不确定。非随机研究的质量为中等。在 5 项研究中,TSAD 置于颧下嵴,在 2 项研究中,TSAD 置于颊侧根间区,在 2 项研究中,TSAD 置于中腭区。颊侧根间区 TSAD 时第一磨牙远移 2.75mm,而腭侧和颧下嵴 TSAD 时远移 4.07mm 和 4.17mm。腭侧矫治器使第一磨牙远中倾斜 11.17°,而颧下嵴和颊侧根间区 TSAD 导致 3.99°和 1.70°的倾斜。
根间区 TSAD 导致的远中倾斜较小,但远移量也较小。腭侧 TSAD 支持的矫治器显示出最大的远中倾斜量。需要进一步开展关于各种设计的 TSAD 支持远移效果的 RCT 或前瞻性研究。