Turner Caitlin M, Arayasirikul Sean, Wilson Erin C
Trans Research Unit for Equity, Center for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Trans Research Unit for Equity, Center for Public Health Research, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113664. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113664. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Marginalization of sex work presents numerous risks for trans women (TW) engaged in the sex trade, including criminalization, traumatization, and contracting HIV. We identified socio-economic and HIV risk disparities among trans women sex workers and others who do sex work (TWSW/OWSW), and evaluated these disparities for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work from pre- and post-implementation of the US 2018 "Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" and "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act" (FOSTA-SESTA).
We analyzed 429 trans women (TW) from the Trans*National cohort study (2016-2019). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) characterized differences in socio-economic and HIV risk outcomes for TWSW/OWSW compared to TW not engaged in sex work over the study period. Adjusted, pre-to-post law changes in these outcomes for TWSW/OWSW versus TW not engaged in sex work were compared using difference-in-differences GEE regression analyses.
Over 18 months, TWSW/OWSW had higher adjusted odds of being unstably housed, having income from criminalized sources, experiencing transphobic hate crimes, experiencing discrimination from police/courts, being incarcerated, meeting sex partners in the street/public settings, meeting sex partners on Craigslist or other online forums (except dating apps), or engaging in condomless anal intercourse, (p < 0.01 for all comparisons); TWSW/OWSW also had a higher mean number of income sources (p = 0.03). One difference-in-differences analysis showed additive interaction: the adjusted mean number of income sources reported by TWSW/OWSW compared to those not engaged in sex work decreased from pre-to post-FOSTA-SESTA (from 1.79 to 1.48 for TWSW/OWSW and from 1.52 to 1.47 for TW not engaged in sex work; p = 0.01).
Disparities in socio-economic and HIV-related risk outcomes exist for TWSW/OWSW in San Francisco. There is an urgent need for comprehensive, long-term follow-up data of TW to accurately analyze policy effects, especially given the recent enactment of a number of other policies targeting TW.
性工作的边缘化给从事性交易的跨性别女性(TW)带来了诸多风险,包括被定罪、遭受创伤以及感染艾滋病毒。我们确定了跨性别女性性工作者和其他从事性工作者(TWSW/OWSW)之间的社会经济和艾滋病毒风险差异,并评估了与未从事性工作的跨性别女性相比,TWSW/OWSW在2018年美国《允许各州和受害者打击在线性交易法案》和《制止助长性交易法案》(FOSTA - SESTA)实施前后的这些差异。
我们分析了来自跨*国队列研究(2016 - 2019年)的429名跨性别女性(TW)。广义估计方程(GEE)描述了在研究期间,与未从事性工作的跨性别女性相比,TWSW/OWSW在社会经济和艾滋病毒风险结果方面的差异。使用差分GEE回归分析比较了TWSW/OWSW与未从事性工作的跨性别女性在法律前后这些结果的调整变化。
在18个月期间,TWSW/OWSW在住房不稳定、有来自犯罪来源的收入、遭受恐跨仇恨犯罪、受到警察/法院歧视、被监禁、在街头/公共场所结识性伴侣、在克雷格列表或其他在线论坛(约会应用除外)结识性伴侣或进行无保护肛交方面的调整后几率更高(所有比较的p < 0.01);TWSW/OWSW的平均收入来源数量也更多(p = 0.03)。一项差分分析显示了相加交互作用:与未从事性工作的人相比,TWSW/OWSW报告的调整后平均收入来源数量从FOSTA - SESTA实施前到实施后有所下降(TWSW/OWSW从1.79降至1.48,未从事性工作的跨性别女性从1.52降至1.47;p = 0.01)。
在旧金山,TWSW/OWSW在社会经济和与艾滋病毒相关的风险结果方面存在差异。迫切需要对跨性别女性进行全面、长期的随访数据,以准确分析政策效果,特别是考虑到最近颁布了一些针对跨性别女性的其他政策。