Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), 46.7 km, Athinon-Souniou Ave., P.O. Box 712, 19013 Anavyssos, Greece.
Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli, 4, Siena 53100, Italy.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Mar;164:111992. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.111992. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
In the framework of the Plastic Busters MPAs project, a harmonization exercise on two methods of microplastic extraction from biological samples i.e. 15% HO digestion and 10% KOH digestion was carried out. The two methods were tested in four laboratories on fish gastrointestinal tracts and mussel tissues spiked with polyethylene, polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate. The recovery percentage of microplastics for each method, species and polymer tested were overall similar among laboratories, and interlaboratory coefficient of variation was less than 11% for the majority of samples. Microplastic recovery rates for the two methods were similar for each sample tested, but overall mean interlaboratory recovery rate using KOH (96.67%) was higher than HO (88.75%) Results validate the use of both methods for extracting microplastics from biota tissues. However, when comparing the two methods in terms of microplastic recovery rate, time consumed, technical difficulties and cost, digestion with 10% KOH is considered optimal.
在“塑料克星”海洋保护区项目的框架内,对两种从生物样本中提取微塑料的方法(即 15% HO 消解和 10% KOH 消解)进行了协调。这两种方法在四个实验室中对添加了聚乙烯、聚丙烯和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯的鱼类胃肠道和贻贝类组织进行了测试。在实验室之间,对每种方法、每种物种和每种聚合物进行测试的微塑料回收率总体相似,大多数样本的实验室间变异系数小于 11%。两种方法对每种测试样本的微塑料回收率相似,但总体而言,KOH(96.67%)的实验室间平均回收率高于 HO(88.75%)。结果验证了这两种方法在从生物组织中提取微塑料方面的使用。然而,在比较两种方法的微塑料回收率、耗时、技术难度和成本时,10% KOH 的消化被认为是最佳选择。