Research Institute of Sports and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Integrative Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Apr;121(4):1167-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04580-6. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Repeated exposure to remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC; short bouts of non-lethal ischaemia) enhances peripheral vascular function within 1 week; whereas, longer periods of rIPC (~ 1 year) may improve cerebral perfusion. Increasing the 'dose' of rIPC may lead to superior effects. Given the similarities between exercise and rIPC, we examined whether adding exercise to the rIPC stimulus leads to greater adaptation in systemic vascular function.
Nineteen individuals with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) were randomly allocated to either 8 weeks of rIPC (n = 9) or 8 weeks of rIPC + exercise (rIPC + Ex) (n = 10). rIPC was applied three times per week in both conditions, and exercise consisted of 50 min (70% heart rate max) of cycling 3 times per week. Peripheral endothelial function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after ischaemia-reperfusion (IR). Cerebrovascular function was assessed by dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and cardio-respiratory fitness (VO) using a maximal aerobic capacity test.
FMD% increased by 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4, 2.8) following rIPC + Ex and by 0.3% (- 1.1, 1.5) in the only rIPC but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.65). Neither intervention evoked a change in dCA or in CVR (P > 0.05). VO increased by 2.8 ml/kg/min (1.7, 3.9) following the rIPC + Ex and by 0.1 ml/kg/min (- 1.0, 1.4) following the rIPC only intervention (P = 0.69).
Combining exercise with rIPC across an 8-week intervention does not lead to superior effects in cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular function compared to a repeated rIPC intervention in individuals at risk of CVD.
重复进行远程缺血预处理(rIPC;短暂的非致死性缺血)可在 1 周内增强外周血管功能;而较长时间的 rIPC(~1 年)可能改善脑灌注。增加 rIPC 的“剂量”可能会产生更好的效果。鉴于运动和 rIPC 之间的相似性,我们研究了在 rIPC 刺激中加入运动是否会导致全身血管功能的更大适应性。
19 名患有心血管疾病(CVD)风险增加的个体被随机分配到 rIPC(n=9)或 rIPC+运动(rIPC+Ex)(n=10)8 周。两种情况下 rIPC 每周进行 3 次,运动包括每周 3 次骑自行车 50 分钟(70%最大心率)。缺血再灌注(IR)前后通过血流介导的舒张(FMD)评估外周内皮功能。通过动态脑自动调节(dCA)和脑血管反应性(CVR)以及最大有氧能力测试评估心血管呼吸功能(VO)。
rIPC+Ex 后 FMD%增加 1.6%(95%CI,0.4,2.8),而仅 rIPC 后增加 0.3%(-1.1,1.5),但无统计学意义(P=0.65)。两种干预均未引起 dCA 或 CVR 的变化(P>0.05)。rIPC+Ex 后 VO 增加 2.8ml/kg/min(1.7,3.9),而仅 rIPC 后增加 0.1ml/kg/min(-1.0,1.4)(P=0.69)。
与重复 rIPC 干预相比,在 CVD 风险个体中,将运动与 rIPC 相结合进行 8 周干预并不能导致脑血管和外周血管功能的更好效果。