Menichetti Julia, Gerwing Jennifer, Borghi Lidia, Gulbrandsen Pål, Vegni Elena
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Health Services Research Unit - Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:611074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611074. eCollection 2020.
The assisted reproductive technology (ART) field deals with consistent and predictable gaps in knowledge. Expressing lack of knowledge with a sentence like "I don't know" can be challenging for doctors. This study examined physicians' negative epistemic disclaimer "non lo so" in Italian ART doctor-couple interactions. In particular, it aimed to reveal specific features of "non lo so": function, topic, temporality, responsibility, and interactional aspects.
This was a video-based observational study. We used microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue to analyze 20 purposively selected triadic consultations from a corpus of 85. This inductive analysis focused on the function, the content (topic and temporality) and some selected interactional aspects of the "non lo so", quantifying and capturing the interaction between these qualitative features.
We found 82 doctors' "non lo so" in the corpus (mean = 4.4; range = 0-15). We discovered three main functions of this expression: propositional ( = 73/82), relational ( = 6/82), discursive ( = 3/82). The most frequent topics raising doctors' "non lo so" were costs ( = 11/82), treatment-related aspects ( = 10/82), and timing issues ( = 9/82). In more than half of the cases ( = 44/82), present issues emerged. The majority ( = 70/82) of "non lo so" was framed using the "I," with doctors' taking personal responsibility. Patients played a role in these expressions from doctors: Patients initiated more than one third of them, and in one fourth of the cases, patients followed up immediately.
Our findings may be related to characteristics of the specific field of ART. Doctors in this setting must frequently express a direct lack of knowledge to their patients, and when they do, they mean it literally. Patients contribute to such disclosures, and their responses suggest that they find them acceptable, showing that they may expect limitations in their potential to conceive.
辅助生殖技术(ART)领域存在一些持续且可预测的知识空白。对于医生而言,用“我不知道”这样的句子来表达知识欠缺可能具有挑战性。本研究考察了意大利ART医患夫妇互动中医生的否定性认知免责声明“non lo so”。具体而言,其旨在揭示“non lo so”的特定特征:功能、主题、时间性、责任以及互动方面。
这是一项基于视频的观察性研究。我们运用面对面对话的微观分析方法,从85例的语料库中对20例经过目的性选择的三方会诊进行分析。这种归纳分析聚焦于“non lo so”的功能、内容(主题和时间性)以及一些选定的互动方面,对这些定性特征之间的互动进行量化和捕捉。
我们在语料库中发现了82次医生的“non lo so”(均值 = 4.4;范围 = 0 - 15)。我们发现该表达有三种主要功能:命题性( = 73/82)、关系性( = 6/82)、话语性( = 3/82)。引发医生“non lo so”的最常见主题是费用( = 11/82)、治疗相关方面( = 10/82)以及时间问题( = 9/82)。在超过一半的案例中( = 44/82),出现的是当前问题。大多数( = 70/82)的“non lo so”是以“我”来表述的,医生承担个人责任。患者在医生的这些表达中发挥了作用:患者发起了其中超过三分之一的表达,并且在四分之一的案例中,患者会立即跟进。
我们的研究结果可能与ART特定领域的特征有关。在这种情况下,医生必须经常向患者直接表明自己知识欠缺,而且当他们这样做时,是字面意义上的表达。患者促成了此类披露,并且他们的反应表明他们认为这些披露是可以接受的,这表明他们可能预期到自己受孕潜力存在局限性。