Suppr超能文献

比较聚合氯化铁和聚四氯化钛在处理造纸和纸板废水的混凝和絮凝过程中的应用。

Comparison of poly ferric chloride and poly titanium tetrachloride in coagulation and flocculation process for paper and cardboard wastewater treatment.

机构信息

Environmental Science and Technology Research Center, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(21):27262-27272. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12675-6. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Abstract

The current study investigated the efficiency of poly ferric chloride (PFC) and poly titanium tetrachloride (PTC) in coagulation-flocculation process for treatment of paper and cardboard wastewater. The effect of pH (5-11), coagulant concentrations (100-1000 mg/L), mixing rate (10-60 rpm), mixing time (5-25 min), and settling time (5-30 min) were examined. The results showed that the removal efficiency for turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) by PFC and PTC coagulants increased with pH rising up to 9 for the former and 7 for the latter coagulant. Furthermore, the removal efficiency for the afore-mentioned parameters increased along with a 30 rpm increase in the mixing rate, while the mixing time reached 20 min. It was also found that the best removal efficiencies for turbidity, TSS, and COD by PFC under optimal conditions (pH 9, coagulant dose 800 mg/L, and settling time of 25 min) were 97.11%, 99.1%, and 84.91%, respectively. In addition, the removal efficiencies for PTC (optimal conditions of pH 7, coagulant dose 600 mg/L, and settling time of 15 min) were found to be 98.29%, 99.29%, and 86.42%, respectively. Water recovery and the produced sludge volume by PFC were 80% and 200 cm, respectively, in the settling time of 25 min and for PTC were 81.5% and 185 cm, respectively, in the settling time of 15 min. Costs of the coagulation-flocculation process for treatment 1 m of paper and cardboard wastewater using PTC and PFC were 0.42 $ and 0.32 $, respectively. Finally, it can be concluded that compared to PFC, PTC with higher settling rate has a greater efficiency for treatment of paper and cardboard wastewater.

摘要

本研究考察了聚合氯化铁(PFC)和聚四氯化钛(PTC)在混凝-絮凝工艺中处理造纸和纸板废水的效率。考察了 pH 值(5-11)、混凝剂浓度(100-1000mg/L)、混合速度(10-60rpm)、混合时间(5-25min)和沉降时间(5-30min)的影响。结果表明,PFC 和 PTC 混凝剂对浊度、总悬浮固体(TSS)和化学需氧量(COD)的去除效率随 pH 值升高至 9(前者)和 7(后者)而增加。此外,随着混合速率从 30rpm 增加,上述参数的去除效率增加,而混合时间达到 20min。还发现,在最佳条件下(pH9、混凝剂剂量 800mg/L、沉降时间 25min),PFC 对浊度、TSS 和 COD 的最佳去除效率分别为 97.11%、99.1%和 84.91%。此外,在最佳条件下(pH7、混凝剂剂量 600mg/L、沉降时间 15min),PTC 的去除效率分别为 98.29%、99.29%和 86.42%。在沉降时间为 25min 时,PFC 的水回收率和产生的污泥体积分别为 80%和 200cm3,而在沉降时间为 15min 时,PTC 的水回收率和产生的污泥体积分别为 81.5%和 185cm3。用 PTC 和 PFC 处理 1m3 造纸和纸板废水的混凝-絮凝工艺成本分别为 0.42 美元和 0.32 美元。最后,可以得出结论,与 PFC 相比,具有更高沉降速率的 PTC 对处理造纸和纸板废水具有更高的效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验