Gervais Will M
Centre for Culture and Evolution, Department of Psychology, Brunel University London.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):827-843. doi: 10.1177/1745691620977471. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
In the face of unreplicable results, statistical anomalies, and outright fraud, introspection and changes in the psychological sciences have taken root. Vibrant reform and metascience movements have emerged. These are exciting developments and may point toward practical improvements in the future. Yet there is nothing so practical as good theory. This article outlines aspects of reform and metascience in psychology that are ripe for an injection of theory, including a lot of excellent and overlooked theoretical work from different disciplines. I review established frameworks that model the process of scientific discovery, the types of scientific networks that we ought to aspire to, and the processes by which problematic norms and institutions might evolve, focusing especially on modeling from the philosophy of science and cultural evolution. We have unwittingly evolved a toxic scientific ecosystem; existing interdisciplinary theory may help us intelligently design a better one.
面对无法重复的结果、统计异常以及公然的欺诈行为,心理学领域的内省和变革已开始生根发芽。充满活力的改革和元科学运动应运而生。这些都是令人兴奋的发展,可能预示着未来会有切实的改进。然而,没有什么比好的理论更具实用性了。本文概述了心理学中改革和元科学的一些方面,这些方面亟待理论的注入,其中包括许多来自不同学科的优秀且被忽视的理论工作。我回顾了已有的框架,这些框架对科学发现的过程、我们应该追求的科学网络类型以及有问题的规范和制度可能演变的过程进行了建模,特别关注科学哲学和文化进化的建模。我们不知不觉地演化出了一个有害的科学生态系统;现有的跨学科理论或许能帮助我们明智地设计出一个更好的系统。