Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Dotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Oregon, USA.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Mar;27(2):232-237. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.19530.
Maximally decreasing portal pressures with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is associated with improved ascites control but also increased encephalopathy incidence. Since splenic venous flow contributes to portal hypertension, we assessed if combining small-diameter TIPS with splenic artery embolization could improve ascites while minimizing encephalopathy.
Fifty-five patients underwent TIPS creation for refractory ascites. Subjects underwent creation of 8 mm TIPS followed by proximal splenic artery embolization (group A, n=8), or of 8 mm (group B, n=6) or 10 mm TIPS (group C, n=41) without splenic embolization. Data were retrospectively reviewed.
In group A, median portosystemic gradient decreased from 19 mmHg to 9 mmHg after TIPS, and 8 mmHg after subsequent splenic artery embolization. In groups B and C, gradient decreased from 15 mmHg to 8 mmHg and 16 mmHg to 6 mmHg. All patients except for one in group A and two in C had greater than 50% reduction in the number of paracenteses in 3 months. Any postprocedural encephalopathy incidence was 62%, 50%, 83% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Overall, 20% of subjects with 10 mm TIPS required TIPS reduction/closure compared to 7% of subjects with 8 mm TIPS.
We found that 8 mm diameter TIPS provided similar ascites control compared to 10 mm TIPS regardless of splenic embolization. While more patients with 10 mm TIPS required reduction/closure for severe encephalopathy, the study was underpowered for definitive assessment. Splenic embolization might have the potential to further decrease portosystemic gradient and ascites as an alternative to dilation of TIPS to 10 mm minimizing the risk of encephalopathy, but larger studies are warranted.
通过经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)最大限度地降低门静脉压力与改善腹水控制相关,但也会增加肝性脑病的发生率。由于脾静脉血流有助于门静脉高压,我们评估了联合小直径 TIPS 和脾动脉栓塞是否可以在最小化肝性脑病的同时改善腹水。
55 例难治性腹水患者接受 TIPS 治疗。患者行 8mm TIPS 造口术,然后行近端脾动脉栓塞(A 组,n=8),或行 8mm(B 组,n=6)或 10mm TIPS(C 组,n=41)而不进行脾栓塞。数据进行回顾性分析。
A 组 TIPS 后门静脉系统压力梯度从 19mmHg 降至 9mmHg,随后脾动脉栓塞后降至 8mmHg。B 组和 C 组压力梯度分别从 15mmHg 降至 8mmHg 和 16mmHg 降至 6mmHg。除 A 组 1 例和 C 组 2 例患者外,所有患者在 3 个月内的腹腔穿刺次数减少了 50%以上。A、B 和 C 组的术后肝性脑病发生率分别为 62%、50%和 83%。总体而言,与 8mm TIPS 相比,20%的 10mm TIPS 患者需要 TIPS 缩小/关闭,而 7%的 8mm TIPS 患者需要。
我们发现,无论是否进行脾栓塞,8mm 直径的 TIPS 提供的腹水控制与 10mm TIPS 相似。虽然更多的 10mm TIPS 患者因严重肝性脑病需要缩小/关闭,但该研究的效力不足,无法进行明确评估。脾动脉栓塞可能具有进一步降低门静脉压力梯度和腹水的潜力,作为将 TIPS 扩张至 10mm 的替代方法,可最大程度降低肝性脑病的风险,但需要更大规模的研究。