Wang He, Sun Jinping, Cui Dong, Wang Xin, Jin Jingna, Li Ying, Liu Zhipeng, Yin Tao
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
School of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Feb;11(2):810-822. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-404.
Inter-individual variability is an inherent and ineradicable feature of group-level brain atlases that undermines their reliability for clinical and other applications. To date, there have been no reports quantifying inter-individual variability in brain atlases.
In the present study, we compared inter-individual variability in nine brain atlases by task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping of motor and temporal lobe language regions in both cerebral hemispheres. We analyzed complete motor and language task-based fMRI and T1 data for 893 young, healthy subjects in the Human Connectome Project database. Euclidean distances (EDs) between hotspots in specific brain regions were calculated from task-based fMRI and brain atlas data. General linear model parameters were used to investigate the influence of different brain atlases on signal extraction. Finally, the inter-individual variability of ED and extracted signals and interdependence of relevant indicators were statistically evaluated.
We found that inter-individual variability of ED varied across the nine brain atlases (P<0.0001 for motor regions and P<0.0001 for language regions). There was no correlation between parcel number and inter-individual variability in left to right (LtoR; P=0.7959 for motor regions and P=0.2002 for language regions) and right to left (RtoL; P=0.7654 for motor regions and P=0.3544 for language regions) ED; however, LtoR (P≤0.0001) and RtoL (P≤0.0001) inter-individual variability differed according to brain region: the LtoR (P=0.0008) and RtoL (P=0.0004) inter-individual variability was greater for the right hand than for the left hand, the LtoR (P=0.0019) and RtoL (P=0.0179) inter-individual variability was greater for the right language than for the left language, but there was no such difference between the right foot and left foot (LtoR, P=0.2469 and RtoL, P=0.6140). Inter-individual variability in one motor region was positively correlated with mean values in the other three motor regions (left hand, P=0.0145; left foot, P=0.0103; right hand, P=0.1318; right foot, P=0.3785). Inter-individual variability in language region was positively correlated with mean values in the four motor regions (left language, P=0.0422; right language, P=0.0514). Signal extraction for LtoR (P<0.0001) and RtoL (P<0.0001) varied across the nine brain atlases, which also showed differences in inter-individual variability.
These results underscore the importance of quantitatively assessing the inter-individual variability of a brain atlas prior to use, and demonstrate that mapping motor regions by task-based fMRI is an effective method for quantitatively assessing the inter-individual variability in a brain atlas.
个体间变异性是群体水平脑图谱固有的、无法消除的特征,这削弱了它们在临床及其他应用中的可靠性。迄今为止,尚无关于量化脑图谱个体间变异性的报道。
在本研究中,我们通过对大脑两半球运动和颞叶语言区域进行基于任务的功能磁共振成像(MRI)映射,比较了九种脑图谱的个体间变异性。我们分析了人类连接组计划数据库中893名年轻健康受试者的完整运动和语言任务功能磁共振成像及T1数据。根据基于任务的功能磁共振成像和脑图谱数据计算特定脑区热点之间的欧几里得距离(ED)。使用一般线性模型参数研究不同脑图谱对信号提取的影响。最后,对ED和提取信号的个体间变异性以及相关指标的相互依赖性进行统计评估。
我们发现,九种脑图谱的ED个体间变异性各不相同(运动区域P<0.0001,语言区域P<0.0001)。脑区划分数量与左右(LtoR;运动区域P=0.7959,语言区域P=0.2002)和右左(RtoL;运动区域P=0.7654,语言区域P=0.3544)ED的个体间变异性之间无相关性;然而,LtoR(P≤0.0001)和RtoL(P≤0.0001)个体间变异性因脑区而异:右手的LtoR(P=0.0008)和RtoL(P=0.0004)个体间变异性大于左手,右侧语言的LtoR(P=0.0019)和RtoL(P=0.0179)个体间变异性大于左侧语言,但右脚和左脚之间无此差异(LtoR,P=0.2469;RtoL,P=0.6140)。一个运动区域的个体间变异性与其他三个运动区域的平均值呈正相关(左手,P=0.0145;左脚,P=0.0103;右手,P=0.1318;右脚,P=0.3785)。语言区域的个体间变异性与四个运动区域的平均值呈正相关(左侧语言,P=0.0422;右侧语言,P=0.0514)。九种脑图谱的LtoR(P<0.0001)和RtoL(P<0.0001)信号提取各不相同,这也表明个体间变异性存在差异。
这些结果强调了在使用前定量评估脑图谱个体间变异性的重要性,并证明基于任务的功能磁共振成像映射运动区域是定量评估脑图谱个体间变异性的有效方法。