Colella Riccardo, Chietera Francesco Paolo, Catarinucci Luca
National Research Council of Italy, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Innovation Engineering Department, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;21(3):897. doi: 10.3390/s21030897.
In this work, the application in Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) of different additive manufacturing (AM) 3D-printing technologies is discussed. In particular, the well-known Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology is compared with the promising Digital Light Processing (DLP), which is based on the photopolymerization of liquid resins. Based on the research activity of the authors on this topic, a brief introduction to the fundamentals of 3D-printing in electromagnetics as well as to the different applications of both FDM and DLP in realizing Radio Frequency (RF) devices, is firstly given. Then, a comparison of the two technologies is deeply faced. Finally, after evaluated the rugosity of substrates produced with both techniques to verify the potential impact on the design of electromagnetic structures, the two techniques are both exploited for the realization of the dielectric parts of a tunable RFID tag with unconventional shape. It consists of two elements interlinked one each other. The movement between them enables tuning of the resonance frequency as well as the impedance of the antenna. Despite the differences in terms of losses, rugosity, resolution, and dielectric constant, both techniques guaranteed satisfactory values of tag sensitivity, maximum reading range, and tunability. Nevertheless, the careful analysis of the results proposed at the end of the paper suggests how the selection of one technique over the other must be taken considering the specific application constraints.
在这项工作中,讨论了不同增材制造(AM)3D打印技术在射频识别(RFID)中的应用。具体而言,将著名的熔融沉积建模(FDM)技术与基于液体树脂光聚合的有前景的数字光处理(DLP)技术进行了比较。基于作者在该主题上的研究活动,首先简要介绍了电磁学中3D打印的基本原理以及FDM和DLP在实现射频(RF)设备方面的不同应用。然后,深入探讨了这两种技术的比较。最后,在评估了用这两种技术生产的基板的粗糙度以验证对电磁结构设计的潜在影响之后,利用这两种技术实现了具有非常规形状的可调谐RFID标签的介电部分。它由两个相互连接的元件组成。它们之间的移动能够调节谐振频率以及天线的阻抗。尽管在损耗、粗糙度、分辨率和介电常数方面存在差异,但两种技术都保证了标签灵敏度、最大读取范围和可调谐性的令人满意的值。然而,论文结尾对结果的仔细分析表明,在选择一种技术而非另一种技术时,必须考虑特定的应用约束。