Suppr超能文献

白细胞酯酶试验和α-防御素试验对人工关节周围感染的诊断具有相似的准确性。

Leukocyte esterase test and alpha-defensin test have similar accuracy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), 28 Fuxing Rd., Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Bao Ding Gem Flower Eastern Hospital, Bao Ding, Hebei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Jul;45(7):1677-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04903-4. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint replacement remains challenging. Synovial biomarkers are recommended as the major diagnostic criteria for PJI. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the alpha-defensin test and compare it with that of the leukocyte esterase (LE) test for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

We obtained 130 hip or knee aspirates from May 2015 to September 2018. PJI was defined according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Synovial fluid samples were tested with the alpha-defensin ELISA and a LE strip. For the LE strip test, besides using the traditional threshold 500 (equal to ++), we are also using an improved one, with 500 (equal to ++) serving as the threshold for the tests before centrifugation and both 250 and 500 indicating positive results after centrifugation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Cohen's Kappa value were calculated for the LE and alpha-defensin tests.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of alpha-defensin, LE strip test with traditional, and improved interpretation strategy were 0.875, 0.854, and 0.877, respectively. The Cohen's Kappa value for the alpha-defensin tests was 0.826 with the traditional LE interpretation strategy and 0.875 with the improved strategy.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that the use of the LE strip to test synovial fluid yielded an accuracy similar to that of the alpha-defensin immunoassay for the diagnosis of PJI; this finding supports the 2018 ICM PJI definition, which considers positive alpha-defensin and LE test results to be equivalent.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染(PJI)的诊断仍然具有挑战性。滑膜生物标志物被推荐为 PJI 的主要诊断标准。本研究旨在测试α-防御素检测的准确性,并将其与白细胞酯酶(LE)检测进行比较,以诊断 PJI。

方法

我们从 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 9 月获得了 130 例髋关节或膝关节抽吸物。根据欧洲骨与关节感染学会(EBJIS)标准定义 PJI。使用α-防御素 ELISA 和 LE 条带测试滑液样本。对于 LE 条带测试,除了使用传统的阈值 500(相当于 ++)外,我们还使用了改进的阈值,即 500(相当于 ++)作为离心前测试的阈值,250 和 500 表示离心后阳性结果。计算 LE 和α-防御素检测的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和 Cohen's Kappa 值。

结果

α-防御素、传统解释策略下的 LE 条带测试和改进解释策略下的 LE 条带测试的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.875、0.854 和 0.877。使用传统 LE 解释策略时,α-防御素检测的 Cohen's Kappa 值为 0.826,使用改进策略时为 0.875。

结论

本研究表明,使用 LE 条带测试滑液可获得与α-防御素免疫测定相似的 PJI 诊断准确性;这一发现支持 2018 年 ICM PJI 定义,该定义认为阳性的α-防御素和 LE 检测结果是等效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验