Suppr超能文献

自然周期中从卵母细胞采集到冷冻胚胎移植的时间并不影响生殖或新生儿结局。

Time from oocyte retrieval to frozen embryo transfer in the natural cycle does not impact reproductive or neonatal outcomes.

机构信息

The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2021 May;115(5):1232-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the time from oocyte retrieval to frozen embryo transfer (FET) in the natural cycle affects reproductive or neonatal outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): Five hundred and seventy-six consecutive freeze-all cycles from January 2011 to December 2018 followed by natural cycle FET of a single blastocyst.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome of live birth; secondary outcomes of preterm delivery (24-37 weeks) and small for gestational age (SGA) with a multivariable logistic regression performed with adjustment for age, infertility diagnosis, ovulatory trigger type, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).

RESULT(S): Before adjustment for confounding, we found a statistically significantly different live-birth rate (57.7% vs. 48.6%) for natural cycle FET occurring in the first versus second menstrual cycle, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, performing a natural cycle FET of a single blastocyst in the second compared with the first menstrual cycle did not statistically significantly impact the odds of live-birth rate. After adjustment for age, diagnosis, and ovulatory trigger type, only PGT was associated with statistically significantly increased odds of live birth compared with no PGT. There were no differences in the incidence of SGA (male, 6.6% vs. 2.3%; female, 9.8% vs. 11.1%) or preterm delivery (1.6% vs. 5.6%) between both groups.

CONCLUSION(S): Performing a natural cycle FET of a single blastocyst in the second compared with the first menstrual cycle after ovarian stimulation did not statistically significantly impact the odds of live birth or neonatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定卵母细胞取出后到自然周期冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的时间是否会影响生殖或新生儿结局。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

不适用。

患者

2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月连续进行的 576 例全胚冷冻保存周期,随后进行单个囊胚的自然周期 FET。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

活产主要结局;早产(24-37 周)和小于胎龄儿(SGA)的次要结局,采用多变量逻辑回归分析,并对年龄、不孕诊断、排卵诱导类型和植入前遗传学检测(PGT)进行调整。

结果

在调整混杂因素之前,我们发现自然周期 FET 的活产率在第一个和第二个月经周期分别为 57.7%和 48.6%,差异有统计学意义。在多变量分析中,与第一个月经周期相比,第二个月经周期中进行单个囊胚的自然周期 FET 并不显著影响活产率的优势比。在调整年龄、诊断和排卵诱导类型后,只有 PGT 与活产率的优势比显著增加相关,与无 PGT 相比。两组之间 SGA(男性:6.6%比 2.3%;女性:9.8%比 11.1%)或早产(1.6%比 5.6%)的发生率均无差异。

结论

与第一个月经周期相比,在卵巢刺激后第二个月经周期中进行单个囊胚的自然周期 FET 并不显著影响活产率或新生儿结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验