University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Acad Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;45(3):354-359. doi: 10.1007/s40596-021-01417-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
The authors evaluated a reformed psychiatry clerkship curriculum based on entrustable professional activities (EPAs).
The authors conducted an exploratory pilot study of a reformed clerkship curriculum based on EPAs. A novel workplace-based assessment format including an entrustment-supervision scale and curricular adaptations were introduced. The Kirkpatrick model was used to evaluate outcomes of the reformed clerkship curriculum on three levels (1 = acceptance, 2 = learning, 3 = change of behavior).
The pilot student cohort (n = 10) completed a questionnaire, 180 self-assessments (18 per student) on need for supervision, and 63 workplace-based assessments (6.3 per student, in 4 weeks). Level 1: high overall satisfaction with the clerkship (five-point Likert item: average, 4.9; range: 4.0-5.0). Level 2: the overall significant decrease in self-assessed need for supervision before and after the clerkship was two supervision levels (direct to indirect supervision; p < 0.05). The most frequently documented admissions included schizophrenic disorders (n = 11; 28%), affective disorders (n = 10; 25%), substance abuse disorders (n = 5; 13%), and anxiety and stress-related disorders (n = 5; 13%). Level 3: clinical supervisors used history taking, assessing the mental status, and documentation and presentation for workplace-based assessments. According to supervisors' ratings, there was a decreasing need for supervision from the first to last week of the clerkship.
Students reacted positively to the reformed clerkship curriculum. The workplace-based assessments with entrustment ratings appeared to support achievement of competency-based learning objectives. Better understanding of how to cover assessment of all core EPAs in the psychiatry clerkship is needed.
作者评估了一项基于可委托专业活动(EPAs)的精神病学实习课程改革。
作者对一项基于 EPAs 的改革后实习课程进行了探索性试点研究。采用了一种新的基于工作场所的评估形式,包括委托-监督量表和课程调整。采用柯克帕特里克模型评估改革后实习课程在三个层面(1=接受,2=学习,3=行为改变)的结果。
试点学生组(n=10)完成了一份问卷,180 份自我评估(每位学生 18 份),评估监督需求,以及 63 份基于工作场所的评估(每位学生 6.3 份,在 4 周内完成)。第 1 级:对实习的总体满意度高(五分制量表:平均 4.9;范围:4.0-5.0)。第 2 级:实习前后自我评估的监督需求显著下降两个监督级别(从直接监督到间接监督;p<0.05)。记录最多的入院包括精神分裂症(n=11;28%)、情感障碍(n=10;25%)、物质滥用障碍(n=5;13%)和焦虑和应激相关障碍(n=5;13%)。第 3 级:临床主管使用病史采集、评估精神状态以及文档记录和演示进行基于工作场所的评估。根据主管的评分,实习的第一周到最后一周,监督需求逐渐减少。
学生对改革后的实习课程反应积极。基于委托评分的基于工作场所的评估似乎支持基于能力的学习目标的实现。需要更好地了解如何在精神病学实习中涵盖所有核心 EPA 的评估。