Suppr超能文献

患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)儿童项库同伴关系在荷兰普通人群中的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric item bank peer relationships in the Dutch general population.

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam Public Health, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1100 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):2061-2070. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02781-w. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate the PROMIS Pediatric item bank v2.0 Peer Relationships and compare reliability of the full item bank to its short form, computerized adaptive test (CAT) and the social functioning (SF) subscale of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™).

METHODS

Children aged 8-18 (n = 1327), representative of the Dutch population completed the Peer Relationships item bank. A graded response model (GRM) was fit to the data. Structural validity was assessed by checking item-fit statistics (S-X, p < 0.001 = misfit). For construct validity, a moderately strong correlation (> 0.50) was expected between Peer Relationships and the PedsQL SF subscale. Cross-cultural DIF between U.S. and NL was assessed using logistic regression, where an item with McFadden's pseudo R > 0.02 was considered to have DIF. Percentage of participants reliably measured was assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) < 0.32 as a criterion (reliability of 0.90). Relative efficiency ((1-SEM)/n) was calculated to compare how well the instruments performed relative to the amount of items administered.

RESULTS

In total, 527 (response rate: 39.7%) children completed the PROMIS v2.0 Peer Relationships item bank (n = 15) and the PedsQL™ (n = 23). Structural validity of the Peer Relationships item bank was sufficient, but one item displayed misfit in the GRM model (S-X < 0.001); 5152R1r ("I played alone and kept to myself"). The item 733R1r ("I was a good friend") was the only item that displayed cross-cultural DIF (R = 0.0253). The item bank correlated moderately high (r = 0.61) with the PedsQL SF subscale Reliable measurements were obtained at the population mean and > 2SD in the clinically relevant direction. CAT outperformed all other measures in efficiency. Mean T-score of the Dutch general population was 46.9(SD 9.5).

CONCLUSION

The pediatric PROMIS Peer Relationships item bank was successfully validated for use within the Dutch population and reference data are now available.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证 PROMIS 儿童项目银行 v2.0 同伴关系,并比较完整项目银行与其简短形式、计算机自适应测试(CAT)以及儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL™)社会功能(SF)子量表的可靠性。

方法

8-18 岁的儿童(n=1327),代表荷兰人口,完成了同伴关系项目银行。对数据进行了等级反应模型(GRM)拟合。结构效度通过检查项目拟合统计数据(S-X,p<0.001=不拟合)进行评估。为了评估结构效度,期望同伴关系与 PedsQL SF 子量表之间存在中度强相关性(>0.50)。使用逻辑回归评估美国和 NL 之间的跨文化差异(DIF),其中 McFadden 的伪 R>0.02 的项目被认为存在 DIF。使用测量标准误差(SEM)<0.32 作为标准(0.90 的可靠性)评估可靠测量的参与者百分比。计算相对效率((1-SEM)/n),以比较仪器相对于管理的项目数量的表现如何。

结果

共有 527 名(应答率:39.7%)儿童完成了 PROMIS v2.0 同伴关系项目银行(n=15)和 PedsQL™(n=23)。同伴关系项目银行的结构效度足够,但在 GRM 模型中一个项目显示不拟合(S-X<0.001);5152R1r(“我独自玩耍,独来独往”)。唯一显示跨文化差异(DIF)的项目是 733R1r(“我是一个好朋友”)(R=0.0253)。项目银行与 PedsQL SF 子量表高度相关(r=0.61),在临床相关方向上,在人口平均值和>2SD 处获得可靠测量。CAT 在效率方面优于所有其他措施。荷兰普通人群的平均 T 分数为 46.9(SD 9.5)。

结论

PROMIS 儿童同伴关系项目银行已成功验证可在荷兰人群中使用,现已提供参考数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bfe/8233291/a50563e5ac77/11136_2021_2781_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验