iServiceX, Inc. & Case Western Reserve University, Marietta, Georgia, United States of America.
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247012. eCollection 2021.
Evasive entrepreneurship (circumvention and exploitation of institutions by entrepreneurs) is a prevalent practice in many developing economies. Extant literature on the topic falls short of providing adequate theories to explain its triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Leveraging extensive survey data from the World Bank, we used structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between evasive entrepreneurial behavior-tax evasion and bribery-and the relative payoff of such practices. Of the 2599 Nigerian entrepreneurs in our sample, the majority admitted to engaging in evasive entrepreneurship. The data suggest that institutional factors thought to constrain entrepreneurship in emerging markets are counter-intuitively perceived by founders as opportunities to earn large rents and improve firm performance. Our results emphasize the urgent need to eliminate institutional constraints that paradoxically enable the growth of evasive entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Our results also suggest that prevailing local conventions involving evasive behavior may motivate nascent entrepreneurs to imitate bribery and tax evasion, normalizing malfeasance as 'best practice.'
逃避型创业(企业家规避和利用制度)是许多发展中经济体的普遍做法。现有关于这一主题的文献未能提供充分的理论来解释其触发因素、机制和后果。利用世界银行的广泛调查数据,我们使用结构方程模型研究了逃避型创业行为——逃税和贿赂——与这些行为的相对回报之间的关系。在我们的样本中,2599 名尼日利亚企业家中有大多数承认从事逃避型创业。数据表明,新兴市场中被认为限制创业的制度因素,被创始人反直觉地视为赚取巨额租金和提高公司业绩的机会。我们的研究结果强调迫切需要消除制度约束,这些约束反而会使逃避型创业在新兴经济体中得以发展。我们的研究结果还表明,普遍存在的涉及逃避行为的当地惯例可能会促使初创企业家模仿贿赂和逃税,将不当行为正常化为“最佳实践”。