Suppr超能文献

两种技术辅助的手动发药系统与传统手动发药在医院门诊药房的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of two technology-assisted manual medication picking systems versus traditional manual picking in a hospital outpatient pharmacy.

机构信息

Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Singapore.

Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Singapore

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Mar;28(2):100-105. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001997. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two technology assisted manual medication picking systems vs traditional manual picking.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study comparing three outpatient pharmacies of a tertiary referral hospital in Singapore, where a light-emitting diode (LED-guided) manual picking system, an LED-guided manual picking plus lockable drawer (LED-LD) system, and traditional manual picking were implemented, respectively. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of medication near-misses over the observation period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per near-miss avoided was also determined. Data on medications picked and near-misses reported between September 2017 and June 2018 were retrieved from electronic databases. The incidence of medication near-misses from the LED-guided and LED-LD systems, relative to traditional picking, was compared using logistic regression. We compared annual operating costs between manual medication picking systems, and reported ICERs per near-miss avoided, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each picking system.

RESULTS

A total of 358 144, 397 343 and 254 162 medications were picked by traditional manual picking, LED-guided and LED-LD systems, respectively. The corresponding near-miss rates were 8.32, 4.08 and 0.69 per 10 000 medications picked, respectively. Medication near-miss rates were significantly lower for the LED-guided (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59, p<0.001) and LED-LD systems (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.13, p<0.001) compared with traditional picking. The annual operating costs of traditional picking, LED-guided and LED-LD systems were S$60 912, S$129 832 and S$152 894, respectively. The LED-guided and LED-LD systems yielded ICERs of S$189 and S$140 per near-miss avoided, respectively, compared with traditional manual picking.

CONCLUSION

The LED-LD system is more cost-effective than both the LED-guided and manual medication picking systems in reducing medication picking near-misses.

摘要

目的

评估两种辅助手动配药系统与传统手动配药相比的成本效益。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,比较了新加坡一家三级转诊医院的三个门诊药房,分别实施了发光二极管(LED)引导手动配药系统、带锁抽屉的 LED 引导手动配药系统(LED-LD 系统)和传统手动配药系统。主要结局指标为观察期间药物接近错误的发生率。还确定了每避免一次接近错误的增量成本效益比(ICER)。从 2017 年 9 月至 2018 年 6 月,从电子数据库中检索了配药和报告的接近错误数据。使用逻辑回归比较了 LED 引导和 LED-LD 系统与传统采集相比的药物接近错误发生率。我们比较了手动药物采集系统的年运营成本,并报告了每避免一次接近错误的 ICER,以评估每种采集系统的成本效益。

结果

传统手动采集、LED 引导和 LED-LD 系统分别采集了 358144、397343 和 254162 种药物。相应的接近错误率分别为每 10000 种药物 8.32、4.08 和 0.69。LED 引导(OR 0.49,95%CI 0.40 至 0.59,p<0.001)和 LED-LD 系统(OR 0.08,95%CI 0.05 至 0.13,p<0.001)的药物接近错误率明显低于传统采集。传统采集、LED 引导和 LED-LD 系统的年运营成本分别为 60912 新加坡元、129832 新加坡元和 152894 新加坡元。LED 引导和 LED-LD 系统每避免一次接近错误的 ICER 分别为 189 新加坡元和 140 新加坡元,与传统手动配药相比。

结论

与传统手动配药相比,LED-LD 系统在减少药物配药接近错误方面比 LED 引导和手动药物配药系统更具成本效益。

相似文献

2
Contributing factors to outpatient pharmacy near miss errors: a Malaysian prospective multi-center study.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):237-243. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0762-1. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Automated Medication System Implemented in a Danish Hospital Setting.
Value Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(7):886-893. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Cost-effectiveness of central automated unit dose dispensing with barcode-assisted medication administration in a hospital setting.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Nov;18(11):3980-3987. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches to outpatient pharmacy automation: a systematic review.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 May;26(3):157-162. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001424. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
A systematic review of the nature of dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies.
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016 Jan 12;5:1-10. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S95733. eCollection 2016.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an Automated Medication System Implemented in a Danish Hospital Setting.
Value Health. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(7):886-893. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
Economic impact of medication error: a systematic review.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 May;26(5):481-497. doi: 10.1002/pds.4188. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
6
Near Misses and Their Importance for Improving Patient Safety.
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Jun;43(6):853-4.
7
Medication safety strategies in hospitals--a systematic review.
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):117-31. doi: 10.3233/JRS-140623.
8
Effect of automated drug distribution systems on medication error rates in a short-stay geriatric unit.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):678-84. doi: 10.1111/jep.12202. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
The impact of automation on pharmacy staff experience of workplace stressors.
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Apr;21(2):105-16. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00231.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验