Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK.
School of Applied Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 May;226(4):1241-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02237-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Previous work investigating the effect of rTMS of left Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) on Stroop task performance reports no changes to the Stroop effect but reduced reaction times on both congruent and incongruent trials relative to sham stimulation; an effect attributed to an enhanced attentional (or task) set for colour classification. The present study tested this account by investigating whether, relative to vertex stimulation, rTMS of the left DLPFC modifies task conflict, a form of conflict that arises when task sets for colour classification and word reading compete, given that this particular type of conflict would be reduced by an enhanced task set for colour classification. Furthermore, the present study included measures of other forms of conflict present in the Stroop task (response and semantic conflict), the potential effects on which would have been hidden in previous studies employing only incongruent and congruent stimuli. Our data showed that left DLPFC stimulation had no effect on the magnitude of task conflict, nor did it affect response, semantic or overall conflict (where the null is supported by sensitive Bayes Factors in most cases). However, consistent with previous research left DLPFC stimulation had the general effect of reducing reaction times. We, therefore, show for the first time that relative to real vertex stimulation left DLPFC stimulation does not modify Stroop interference. Alternative accounts of the role of the left DLPFC in Stroop task performance in which it either modifies response thresholds or facilitates responding by keeping the correct response keys active in working memory are discussed.
先前的研究调查了经颅磁刺激左背外侧前额叶(DLPFC)对斯特鲁普任务表现的影响,报告称其并未改变斯特鲁普效应,但相对于假刺激,在一致和不一致的试验中反应时间均缩短;这种效应归因于增强了对颜色分类的注意力(或任务)设定。本研究通过调查相对于顶点刺激,左 DLPFC 的 rTMS 是否改变任务冲突(当颜色分类和阅读单词的任务集竞争时出现的一种冲突形式),从而验证了这一说法,因为这种特殊类型的冲突会因增强颜色分类的任务集而减少。此外,本研究还包括了斯特鲁普任务中其他形式的冲突(反应和语义冲突)的测量,这在以前仅使用不一致和一致刺激的研究中可能被隐藏。我们的数据显示,左 DLPFC 刺激对任务冲突的大小没有影响,也没有影响反应、语义或整体冲突(在大多数情况下,零假设都得到了敏感贝叶斯因子的支持)。然而,与先前的研究一致,左 DLPFC 刺激具有普遍降低反应时间的效果。因此,我们首次表明,相对于真实顶点刺激,左 DLPFC 刺激不会改变斯特鲁普干扰。我们讨论了左 DLPFC 在斯特鲁普任务表现中的作用的替代解释,其中它要么通过改变反应阈值,要么通过保持正确的反应键在工作记忆中保持活动来促进反应。