Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (V.H.E.C., G.K.H.L., A.S.T.L., Y.-K.T., C.G., V.K.S., B.Y.Q.T., L.L.L.Y.).
Department of Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (C.-H.T.).
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1192-1202. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031738. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
In patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the role of intra-arterial adjunctive medications (IAMs), such as urokinase, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator), or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been clearly established. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concomitant or rescue IAM for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion patients undergoing MT.
We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register databases from inception until March 13, 2020. We analyzed all studies with patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior or posterior circulation that provided data for the two treatment arms, (1) MT+IAM and (2) MT only, and also reported on at least one of the following efficacy outcomes, recanalization and 90-day modified Rankin Scale, or safety outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Data were collated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Sixteen nonrandomized observational studies with a total of 4581 patients were analyzed. MT only was performed in 3233 (70.6%) patients, while 1348 (29.4%) patients were treated with both MT and IAM. As compared with patients treated with MT alone, patients treated with combination therapy (MT+IAM) had a higher likelihood of achieving good functional outcome (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.24]) and a lower risk of 90-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94]). There was no significant difference in successful recanalization (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99-1.06]) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87-1.46]).
In acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion, the use of IAM together with MT may achieve better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of IAM as adjunctive treatment to MT.
在急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中,机械血栓切除术(MT)过程中使用尿激酶、tPA(组织型纤溶酶原激活物)或糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂等动脉内辅助药物(IAM)的作用尚未明确。我们旨在评估 MT 治疗的急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中联合使用或挽救性 IAM 的疗效和安全性。
我们从开始到 2020 年 3 月 13 日检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 卒中组试验登记数据库。我们分析了所有在前循环或后循环中诊断为急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的患者的研究,这些研究为两个治疗组(1)MT+IAM 和(2)仅 MT 提供了数据,并且还报告了至少以下疗效结果之一、再通和 90 天改良 Rankin 量表,或安全性结果、症状性颅内出血和 90 天死亡率。数据按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了整理。
对 16 项非随机观察性研究(共 4581 例患者)进行了分析。仅进行 MT 的患者有 3233 例(70.6%),而同时进行 MT 和 IAM 的患者有 1348 例(29.4%)。与单独接受 MT 治疗的患者相比,联合治疗(MT+IAM)的患者更有可能获得良好的功能结局(风险比,1.13[95%CI,1.03-1.24]),90 天死亡率较低(风险比,0.82[95%CI,0.72-0.94])。两组间再通的成功率(风险比,1.02[95%CI,0.99-1.06])和症状性颅内出血无显著差异(风险比,1.13[95%CI,0.87-1.46])。
在急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中,使用 IAM 联合 MT 可能会获得更好的功能结局和更低的死亡率。需要随机对照试验来确定 IAM 作为 MT 辅助治疗的安全性和疗效。