• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies.内感受性精神病理学中反刍和担忧的静息态功能连接相关性。
Depress Anxiety. 2021 May;38(5):488-497. doi: 10.1002/da.23142. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Repetitive negative thinking and suicidal ideation in internalizing psychopathologies: A replication study.内感性精神病理学中的重复性消极思维和自杀意念:一项复制研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2024 Nov;182:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104622. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Trait repetitive negative thinking in depression is associated with functional connectivity in negative thinking state rather than resting state.抑郁特质性重复消极思维与消极思维状态下的功能连接有关,而与静息状态无关。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 1;340:843-854. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.052. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
4
Effects of modifying interpretation bias on transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking.修正解释偏差对跨诊断重复性消极思维的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Mar;88(3):226-239. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000455.
5
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition.针对伴有和不伴有既往反复消极思维的解释进行认知偏差修正,以减少广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症中的担忧和沉思:一项带有积极对照条件的多阶段实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 16;6(12):e013404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404.
6
The relationship between worry, rumination, and comorbidity: evidence for repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic construct.担忧、反刍与共病之间的关系:重复消极思维作为一种跨诊断结构的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Repetitive negative thinking as a predictor of depression and anxiety: A longitudinal cohort study.重复性消极思维对抑郁和焦虑的预测作用:一项纵向队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:216-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
Are All Anxieties Created Equal? Stress-related Networks and Anxiety Phenotypes in Old Age.所有焦虑都是平等的吗?老年与压力相关的网络和焦虑表型。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;30(7):801-812. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
9
Networks of worry-towards a connectivity-based signature of late-life worry using higher criticism.担忧网络——基于高阶分析的老年期担忧连通性特征
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 28;11(1):550. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01648-5.
10
Intensity of repetitive negative thinking in depression is associated with greater functional connectivity between semantic processing and emotion regulation areas.抑郁患者的重复消极思维强度与语义处理和情绪调节区域之间的功能连接增强有关。
Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;53(12):5488-5499. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002677. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Specificity of Metacognition Questionnaire-30 Subdimensions: Findings From Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling.元认知问卷-30子维度的特异性:基于连接组的预测模型研究结果
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Aug 19;2025:5581270. doi: 10.1155/da/5581270. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural correlates of rumination in remitted depressive episodes: Brain network connectivity and topology analyses.缓解期抑郁发作中反刍思维的神经关联:脑网络连接性与拓扑分析。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):105555. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i6.105555.
3
The desegregation of neural networks during worry induction in late-life-an effective connectivity analysis.晚年忧虑诱发期间神经网络的去隔离——有效连接性分析
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.04.010.
4
Identifying Features of Resilience to Childhood Maltreatment in Resting-State Connectivity Data From Adults With and Without a History of Mood Disorder.从有和没有情绪障碍病史的成年人静息态连接数据中识别对童年虐待的复原力特征。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Mar 4;5(3):100479. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100479. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Difficult-to-Treat Anxiety: A Neurocomputational Framework.难治性焦虑:一种神经计算框架
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.008.
6
Resting state connectivity patterns associated with trait anxiety in adolescence.与青少年特质焦虑相关的静息态连接模式。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94790-9.
7
Reciprocal causation relationship between rumination thinking and sleep quality: a resting-state fMRI study.反刍思维与睡眠质量之间的相互因果关系:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10223-3. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
8
Unveiling Frequency-Specific Microstate Correlates of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms.揭示焦虑和抑郁症状的频率特异性微状态相关因素。
Brain Topogr. 2024 Nov 5;38(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01082-y.
9
Functional activity and connectivity signatures of ketamine and lamotrigine during negative emotional processing: a double-blind randomized controlled fMRI study.功能性活动和连接特征的氯胺酮和拉莫三嗪在负面情绪处理期间:一项双盲随机对照 fMRI 研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):436. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03120-6.
10
Deficient salience and default mode functional integration in high worry-proneness subject: a connectome-wide association study.高易焦虑倾向个体的显著性不足和默认模式功能整合:一项全脑连接组关联研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Dec;18(6):1560-1568. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00951-1. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Can't get it off my brain: Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on perseverative cognition.难以释怀:持续认知的神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2020 Jan 30;295:111020. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.111020. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
Emotion-based brain mechanisms and predictors for SSRI and CBT treatment of anxiety and depression: a randomized trial.基于情绪的大脑机制及预测因子对 SSRI 和 CBT 治疗焦虑和抑郁的效果:一项随机试验。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Aug;44(9):1639-1648. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0407-7. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Is repetitive negative thinking a transdiagnostic process? A comparison of key processes of RNT in depression, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and community controls.重复性消极思维是否具有跨诊断共性?对抑郁、广泛性焦虑障碍、强迫症和社区对照组中 RNT 的关键过程的比较。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Explicit and Ambiguous Threat Processing: Functionally Dissociable Roles of the Amygdala and Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis.明确和模糊威胁处理:杏仁核和终纹床核的功能分离作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Apr;31(4):543-559. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01369. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Functional connectivity of reflective and brooding rumination in depressed and healthy women.抑郁和健康女性反思性沉思和内省性沉思的功能连接。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct;18(5):884-901. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0611-7.
6
Reliability, Convergent Validity and Time Invariance of Default Mode Network Deviations in Early Adult Major Depressive Disorder.成年早期重度抑郁症患者默认模式网络偏差的信度、收敛效度和时间不变性
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;9:244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00244. eCollection 2018.
7
Examining a transdiagnostic measure of repetitive thinking in depressed, formerly depressed and never-depressed individuals.检查抑郁、曾抑郁和从未抑郁个体中重复思维的跨诊断测量。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.081. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
8
Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy response in social anxiety disorder with anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala during emotion regulation.在情绪调节过程中利用前扣带回皮层和杏仁核预测社交焦虑障碍的认知行为疗法反应。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Apr 12;15:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.04.006. eCollection 2017.
9
What, Me Worry and Ruminate About and RDoC? The Importance of Targeting Negative Self-Referential Processing.什么,我要担心、反复思考和关注《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)的替代概念框架(RDoC)吗?针对消极自我参照加工的重要性。
Clin Psychol (New York). 2013 Sep;20(3):258-267. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12038. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
10
Resting-state functional connectivity differentiates anxious apprehension and anxious arousal.静息态功能连接可区分焦虑性担忧和焦虑性唤起。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Oct;53(10):1451-9. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12696. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

内感受性精神病理学中反刍和担忧的静息态功能连接相关性。

Resting state functional connectivity correlates of rumination and worry in internalizing psychopathologies.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2021 May;38(5):488-497. doi: 10.1002/da.23142. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1002/da.23142
PMID:33621397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085064/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rumination and worry are repetitive negative thinking (RNT) tendencies that contribute to the development and maintenance of internalizing psychopathologies. Accruing data suggest rumination and worry represent overlapping and unique transdiagnostic cognitive processes. Yet, prior neuroimaging research has mostly focused on rumination in depression, which points to involvement of resting-state brain activity in default mode, executive, salience, and/or affective networks.

METHODS

The current study examined relations between brain activity during rest and RNT in a transdiagnostic sample. Resting-state fMRI data was analyzed in 80 unmedicated patients with internalizing conditions. Regression analysis, controlling for anxiety and depression symptoms, was performed with seed regions implicated in default mode, executive, salience, and affective networks. Rumination and worry were assessed with standard self-report measures.

RESULTS

Whole-brain regression results showed more rumination and worry jointly corresponded with greater positive resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) between the amygdala and prefrontal regions (i.e., middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus). Conversely, more worry (controlling for rumination) corresponded with greater negative rsFC between amygdala and precuneus. No significant results were observed for rumination alone (controlling for worry).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate the affective network plays a role in RNT, and distinct patterns of connectivity between amygdala and regions implicated in the executive and default mode networks were observed across patients with internalizing conditions. Results suggest different mechanisms contribute to RNT as a unitary construct and worry as a unique construct.

摘要

背景

反刍和担忧是重复的消极思维(RNT)倾向,有助于内化精神病理学的发展和维持。越来越多的数据表明,反刍和担忧代表重叠和独特的跨诊断认知过程。然而,先前的神经影像学研究主要集中在抑郁症中的反刍,这表明静息态大脑活动与默认模式、执行、突显和/或情感网络有关。

方法

本研究在一个跨诊断样本中检查了静息状态大脑活动与 RNT 之间的关系。对 80 名未接受药物治疗的有内化症状的患者进行了静息态 fMRI 数据分析。在控制焦虑和抑郁症状的情况下,使用与默认模式、执行、突显和情感网络有关的种子区域进行回归分析。使用标准的自我报告量表评估反刍和担忧。

结果

全脑回归结果表明,更多的反刍和担忧共同对应于杏仁核和前额叶区域(即中额回、下额回)之间更大的正静息态功能连接(rsFC)。相反,更多的担忧(控制反刍)对应于杏仁核和楔前叶之间更大的负 rsFC。单独的反刍(控制担忧)没有观察到显著的结果。

结论

研究结果表明,情感网络在 RNT 中起作用,在有内化症状的患者中,杏仁核和涉及执行和默认模式网络的区域之间存在不同的连接模式。研究结果表明,作为一个整体的 RNT 和作为一个独特的担忧有不同的机制。