ICAP, Columbia University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
International Infection Control Program, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Feb 24;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00879-3.
The Georgia Ministry of Labor, Health, and Social Affairs is working to strengthen its Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Program, but until recently has lacked an assessment of performance gaps and implementation challenges faced by hospital staff.
In 2018, health care hospitals were assessed using a World Health Organization (WHO) adapted tool aimed at implementing the WHO's IPC Core Components. The study included site assessments at 41 of Georgia's 273 hospitals, followed by structured interviews with 109 hospital staff, validation observations of IPC practices, and follow up document reviews.
IPC programs for all hospitals were not comprehensive, with many lacking defined objectives, workplans, targets, and budget. All hospitals had at least one dedicated IPC staff member, 66% of hospitals had IPC staff with some formal IPC training; 78% of hospitals had IPC guidelines; and 55% had facility-specific standard operating procedures. None of the hospitals conducted structured monitoring of IPC compliance and only 44% of hospitals used IPC monitoring results to make unit/facility-specific IPC improvement plans. 54% of hospitals had clearly defined priority healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), standard case definitions and data collection methods in their HAI surveillance systems. 85% hospitals had access to a microbiology laboratory. All reported having posters or other tools to promote hand hygiene, 29% had them for injection safety. 68% of hospitals had functioning hand-hygiene stations available at all points of care. 88% had single patient isolation rooms; 15% also had rooms for cohorting patients. 71% reported having appropriate waste management system.
Among the recommended WHO IPC core components, existing programs, infrastructure, IPC staffing, workload and supplies present within Georgian healthcare hospitals should allow for implementation of effective IPC. Development and dissemination of IPC Guidelines, implementation of an effective IPC training system and systematic monitoring of IPC practices will be an important first step towards implementing targeted IPC improvement plans in hospitals.
格鲁吉亚劳动、卫生和社会事务部正在努力加强其感染预防和控制(IPC)计划,但直到最近,该部门一直缺乏对医院工作人员所面临的绩效差距和实施挑战的评估。
2018 年,使用世界卫生组织(WHO)改编的工具对医疗保健医院进行了评估,该工具旨在实施世卫组织的 IPC 核心组成部分。该研究包括对格鲁吉亚 273 家医院中的 41 家进行现场评估,随后对 109 名医院工作人员进行了结构化访谈,对 IPC 实践进行了验证观察,并对后续文件进行了审查。
所有医院的 IPC 计划都不全面,许多医院缺乏明确的目标、工作计划、目标和预算。所有医院都至少有一名专职的 IPC 工作人员,66%的医院有接受过一些正规 IPC 培训的 IPC 工作人员;78%的医院有 IPC 指南;55%的医院有特定于设施的标准操作程序。没有一家医院对 IPC 合规性进行结构化监测,只有 44%的医院使用 IPC 监测结果制定单位/设施特定的 IPC 改进计划。54%的医院在其 HAI 监测系统中明确定义了优先的医疗保健相关感染(HAI)、标准病例定义和数据收集方法。85%的医院可以获得微生物学实验室。所有报告都有海报或其他工具来促进手卫生,29%的医院有用于注射安全的海报。68%的医院在所有护理点都有功能齐全的手卫生站。88%的医院有单间隔离病房;15%的医院还有用于群体隔离患者的病房。71%的医院报告说有适当的废物管理系统。
在世卫组织建议的 IPC 核心组成部分中,格鲁吉亚医疗保健医院内现有的方案、基础设施、IPC 人员配备、工作量和用品应该能够实施有效的 IPC。制定和传播 IPC 指南、实施有效的 IPC 培训系统以及系统地监测 IPC 实践将是在医院实施有针对性的 IPC 改进计划的重要第一步。