Florida Atlantic University, Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Boca Raton, FL
University of Connecticut.
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2021 Feb 1;35(1):7-23. doi: 10.1891/RTNP-D-20-00095.
For the past 30 years there has been a growing emphasis on evidence as the primary or exclusive basis for nursing practice.
Critical examination of literature related to evidence-based practice from the 1990s to the present.
This review of the nursing literature from the 1990s to the present reveals that in the midst of the movement to promote evidence-based practice as the gold standard, there have been persistent expressions of concern. These concerns are (a) lack of alignment of evidence-based practice with nursing's disciplinary perspective; (b) wrongful privileging of empirical knowledge over other sources of knowledge; (c) underappreciation of the complexity of practice and practice wisdom;(d) possibilities of evidence-based practice thwarting innovation and creativity;(e) vulnerabilities of empirical evidence to be flawed, inconsistent, and influenced by competing interests; (f) situational realities that limit access to and critical appraisal of evidence that access to and critical appraisal of evidence is not feasible or practical; and (g) lack of relationship of evidence-based practice to theory.
We call for a recalibrated practice epistemology that promotes a greater appreciation for the myriad sources of knowledge for nursing practice, and offer recommendations for international change in education, literature, scholarship, and public media.
在过去的 30 年中,证据越来越被强调为护理实践的主要或唯一基础。
对 1990 年代至今与循证实践相关的文献进行批判性检查。
对 1990 年代至今的护理文献进行回顾,揭示了在推广循证实践作为黄金标准的运动中,一直存在着持续的关注。这些关注点是:(a)循证实践与护理学科观点不一致;(b)错误地将实证知识置于其他知识来源之上;(c)对实践复杂性和实践智慧的重视不足;(d)循证实践可能阻碍创新和创造力;(e)实证证据存在缺陷、不一致和受竞争利益影响的可能性;(f)实际情况限制了对证据的获取和批判性评估,获取和批判性评估证据是不可行或不切实际的;(g)循证实践与理论缺乏联系。
我们呼吁重新调整实践认识论,以提高对护理实践中众多知识来源的重视,并为教育、文献、学术和公共媒体的国际变革提出建议。