• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非人群中具有奠基者单倍型的全球罕见变异:基于单机构下一代测序研究对即时检验的意义

Globally Rare Variants With Founder Haplotypes in the South African Population: Implications for Point-of-Care Testing Based on a Single-Institution Next-Generation Sequencing Study.

作者信息

Oosthuizen Jaco, Kotze Maritha J, Van Der Merwe Nicole, Myburgh Ettienne J, Bester Phillip, van der Merwe Nerina C

机构信息

Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 12;10:619469. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.619469. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.619469
PMID:33643918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908826/
Abstract

Breast cancer patients historically benefitted from population-based genetic research performed in South Africa, which led to the development of founder-based diagnostic tests. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the clinical utility of limited, targeted genetic assays were questioned. The study focused on mining NGS data obtained from an extensive single-institution NGS series (n=763). The aims were to determine (i) the prevalence of the most common recurrent/founder variants in patients referred for NGS directly; and (ii) to explore the data for inferred haplotypes associated with previous and potential new recurrent/founder variants. The identification of additional founder variants was essential for promoting and potentially advancing to rapid founder-based point-of-care (POC) technology as a time- and cost-effective alternative. NGS revealed actionable variants in 11.1% of patients tested ( - 4.7%; - 6.4%), of which 22.4% represented variants currently screened for using first-tier targeted genetic testing. A retrospective investigation into the overall mutation-positive rate for an extended cohort (n=1906), which included first-tier test results, revealed that targeted genetic testing identified 74% of all pathogenic variants. This percentage justified the use of targeted genetic testing as a first-tier assay. Inferred haplotype analysis confirmed the founder status of c.5771_5774del (rs80359535) and c.7934del (rs80359688) and revealed an additional African founder variant ( c.582G>A - rs80358810). A risk-benefit analysis using a questionnaire-based survey was performed in parallel to determine genetic professionals' views regarding POC testing. This was done to bridge the clinical implementation gap between haplotype analysis and POC testing as a first-tier screen during risk stratification of breast and ovarian cancer patients. The results reflected high acceptance (94%) of POC testing when accompanied by genetic counselling. Establishing the founder status for several recurrent variants across ethnic groups supports unselected use of the BRCA POC assay in all SA breast/ovarian cancer patients by recent local and international public health recommendations. Incorporating POC genotyping into the planned NGS screening algorithm of the Department of Health will ensure optimal use of the country's recourses to adhere to the set standards for optimal care and management for all breast cancer patients.

摘要

从历史上看,南非开展的基于人群的基因研究使乳腺癌患者受益,这推动了基于始祖突变的诊断检测方法的发展。随着下一代测序(NGS)技术的出现,有限的靶向基因检测的临床实用性受到质疑。该研究聚焦于挖掘从一个大型单机构NGS系列(n = 763)中获得的NGS数据。其目的是确定:(i)直接接受NGS检测的患者中最常见的复发性/始祖突变的患病率;以及(ii)探索与先前和潜在的新复发性/始祖突变相关的推断单倍型数据。识别额外的始祖突变对于推动并可能发展基于始祖突变的快速即时护理(POC)技术至关重要,因为它是一种具有时间和成本效益的替代方法。NGS在11.1%的检测患者中发现了可采取行动的突变(-4.7%;-6.4%),其中22.4%代表目前使用一线靶向基因检测筛查的突变。对一个扩大队列(n = 1906)的总体突变阳性率进行回顾性调查,其中包括一线检测结果,发现靶向基因检测识别出了所有致病变异的74%。这一比例证明了将靶向基因检测用作一线检测方法的合理性。推断单倍型分析证实了c.5771_5774del(rs80359535)和c.7934del(rs80359688)的始祖突变状态,并发现了另一个非洲始祖突变(c.582G>A - rs80358810)。同时,通过基于问卷的调查进行了风险效益分析,以确定基因专业人员对POC检测的看法。这样做是为了弥合单倍型分析与POC检测作为乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者风险分层中的一线筛查之间的临床实施差距。结果显示,在有基因咨询的情况下,POC检测的接受度很高(94%)。确定不同种族中几种复发性突变的始祖突变状态,支持了近期本地和国际公共卫生建议中对所有南非乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者无差别使用BRCA POC检测方法。将POC基因分型纳入卫生部计划的NGS筛查算法中,将确保最佳利用该国资源,以符合为所有乳腺癌患者提供最佳护理和管理的既定标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/a810aa9b5ab7/fonc-10-619469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/e6b3d3c6bf3d/fonc-10-619469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/5ab658703139/fonc-10-619469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/a810aa9b5ab7/fonc-10-619469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/e6b3d3c6bf3d/fonc-10-619469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/5ab658703139/fonc-10-619469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/7908826/a810aa9b5ab7/fonc-10-619469-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Globally Rare Variants With Founder Haplotypes in the South African Population: Implications for Point-of-Care Testing Based on a Single-Institution Next-Generation Sequencing Study.南非人群中具有奠基者单倍型的全球罕见变异:基于单机构下一代测序研究对即时检验的意义
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 12;10:619469. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.619469. eCollection 2020.
2
Pioneering Point-Of-Care Testing for Integration of Germline and Tumor Genetics in Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Vision for the Future of Translational Pharmacogenomics.乳腺癌风险管理中种系和肿瘤遗传学整合的开创性即时检测:转化药物基因组学的未来愿景。
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 29;11:619817. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.619817. eCollection 2021.
3
Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Germline Variants in a Large Unselected South African Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cohort: A Public Sector Experience.南非一个未经过筛选的大型乳腺癌和卵巢癌队列中临床相关种系变异的患病率:公共部门的经验
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 8;13:834265. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.834265. eCollection 2022.
4
Genetic testing in Poland and Ukraine: should comprehensive germline testing of and be recommended for women with breast and ovarian cancer?波兰和乌克兰的基因检测:是否应推荐对乳腺癌和卵巢癌女性进行全面胚系检测?
Genet Res (Camb). 2020 Aug 10;102:e6. doi: 10.1017/S0016672320000075.
5
BRCA1 founder mutations and beyond in the Polish population: A single-institution BRCA1/2 next-generation sequencing study.波兰人群中的 BRCA1 种系突变及其他:BRCA1/2 下一代测序的单机构研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 24;13(7):e0201086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201086. eCollection 2018.
6
Tumor Testing for Somatic and Germline / Variants in Ovarian Cancer Patients in the Context of Strong Founder Effects.在显著奠基者效应背景下对卵巢癌患者进行体细胞和种系变异的肿瘤检测
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 31;10:1318. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01318. eCollection 2020.
7
Implementation of next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer highlights its genetic heterogeneity.用于遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌分子诊断的下一代测序技术的应用凸显了其基因异质性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):245-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3948-z. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
8
9
First application of next-generation sequencing in Moroccan breast/ovarian cancer families and report of a novel frameshift mutation of the gene.下一代测序技术在摩洛哥乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中的首次应用及该基因一个新的移码突变报告。
Oncol Lett. 2016 Aug;12(2):1192-1196. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4739. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients in South-East Poland.波兰东南部卵巢癌患者中BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变的频率。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 5;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00219-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Nigerian Breast Cancer Patients.尼日利亚乳腺癌患者种系BRCA1和BRCA2变异的筛查
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251333012. doi: 10.1177/15330338251333012. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Clinical relevance of double heterozygosity revealed by next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination repair pathway genes in South African breast cancer patients.下一代测序揭示南非乳腺癌患者同源重组修复途径基因的双重杂合性的临床意义。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Sep;207(2):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07362-2. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Navigating the genetic landscape of breast cancer in South Africa amidst a developing healthcare system.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1/2 founder variants in individuals who do not self-report Jewish ancestry.在没有自我报告犹太血统的个体中识别阿什肯纳兹犹太人 BRCA1/2 种系变异。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 6;10(1):7669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63466-x.
2
The contribution of large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to South African familial breast cancer.大基因组重排在 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 中对南非家族性乳腺癌的贡献。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 6;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06917-y.
3
Founder BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 pathogenic variants in French-Canadian breast cancer cases and controls.
在南非发展中的医疗体系背景下探索乳腺癌的基因图谱。
Front Genet. 2024 Jan 8;14:1330946. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1330946. eCollection 2023.
4
Genetic contribution of breast cancer genes in women of black African origin.非洲裔黑人女性乳腺癌基因的遗传贡献。
Front Genet. 2023 Dec 13;14:1302645. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1302645. eCollection 2023.
5
Breast Cancer Germline Genetic Counseling and Testing for Populations of African Heritage Globally: A Scoping Review on Research, Practice, and Bioethical Considerations.全球非洲裔人群乳腺癌胚系遗传咨询和检测:基于研究、实践和生物伦理考虑的范围综述。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300154. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00154.
6
Implementation of multigene panel testing for breast and ovarian cancer in South Africa: A step towards excellence in oncology for the public sector.南非乳腺癌和卵巢癌多基因检测的实施:公共部门肿瘤学迈向卓越的一步。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 7;12:938561. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.938561. eCollection 2022.
7
Germline variants profiling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Chinese Hakka breast and ovarian cancer patients.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系变异在中国客家乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者中的分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09943-0.
8
A View on Genomic Medicine Activities in Africa: Implications for Policy.非洲基因组医学活动展望:对政策的影响
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 27;13:769919. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.769919. eCollection 2022.
9
Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Germline Variants in a Large Unselected South African Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cohort: A Public Sector Experience.南非一个未经过筛选的大型乳腺癌和卵巢癌队列中临床相关种系变异的患病率:公共部门的经验
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 8;13:834265. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.834265. eCollection 2022.
10
Prevalence of specific and recurrent/founder pathogenic variants in BRCA genes in breast and ovarian cancer in North Africa.北非乳腺癌和卵巢癌中 BRCA 基因的特定和复发/起始致病性变异的流行率。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09181-4.
在法国裔加拿大乳腺癌病例和对照中发现 BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 种系致病性变异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63100-w.
4
Patterns of African and Asian admixture in the Afrikaner population of South Africa.南非阿非利卡人族群中的非洲和亚洲混合模式。
BMC Biol. 2020 Feb 24;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-0746-1.
5
Population Structure and Implications on the Genetic Architecture of HIV-1 Phenotypes Within Southern Africa.南部非洲的人群结构及其对HIV-1表型遗传结构的影响
Front Genet. 2019 Sep 27;10:905. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00905. eCollection 2019.
6
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Multigene Testing for All Patients With Breast Cancer.对所有乳腺癌患者进行多基因检测的成本效益分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1718-1730. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3323.
7
A systematic review of international guidelines and recommendations for the genetic screening, diagnosis, genetic counseling, and treatment of -mutated breast cancer.一项关于BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌的基因筛查、诊断、遗传咨询及治疗的国际指南与建议的系统综述 。 (你原文中“-mutated”应该是“BRCA1/2-mutated”之类的表述,这里按照常见的BRCA1/2突变型乳腺癌进行了补充完整后的翻译)
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Mar 22;11:2321-2337. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189627. eCollection 2019.
8
Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk-Past, Present, and Future.常见遗传变异与乳腺癌风险:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Apr;27(4):380-394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1144. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
9
BRCA Genetic Testing and Receipt of Preventive Interventions Among Women Aged 18-64 Years with Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas - United States, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国非大都市和大都市地区18 - 64岁参加雇主赞助医疗保险的女性的BRCA基因检测及预防性干预措施的接受情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Sep 8;66(15):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6615a1.
10
Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者的乳腺癌、卵巢癌和对侧乳腺癌风险。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112.