• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔保健研究重点:从从业者的角度制定议程。

Research priorities for oral healthcare: agenda setting from the practitioners' perspective.

机构信息

Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2021 Aug;79(6):451-457. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1887929. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1080/00016357.2021.1887929
PMID:33650460
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a research agenda based on the most important information needs concerning the effects and outcomes of oral healthcare provided by oral healthcare professionals (OHPs).

METHODS

A two-stage survey study was used to identify and prioritise topics for future research. The first survey generated topics based on information needs by OHPs. Topics were clustered thematically and overlapping topics were merged in 84 research themes. In the second survey, respondents selected their top 5 from the 84 research themes. Themes were sorted by the rank number based on rank sum.

RESULTS

In the first survey, 937 topics were suggested. Almost half ( 430, 46%) were identified as topics related to endodontology, cariology, oral medicine/surgery or tooth restoration. Topics were grouped in 84 research themes, covering 10 research domains. These were prioritised by 235 OHPs. Behaviour change for oral health and oral healthcare for geriatric patients ranked as most important.

CONCLUSIONS

Consultation of OHPs has resulted in a research agenda, which can be used to inform programming future oral health research. The highest prioritised research themes have an interdisciplinary nature, mainly concern oral disease prevention and are under-represented in the current oral healthcare research portfolio.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在基于口腔保健专业人员(OHP)提供的口腔保健效果和结果方面最重要的信息需求,制定研究议程。

方法

采用两阶段调查研究来确定和优先考虑未来研究的主题。第一份调查根据 OHP 的信息需求生成主题。主题按主题聚类,重叠主题合并为 84 个研究主题。在第二份调查中,受访者从 84 个研究主题中选择前 5 名。根据秩和对主题进行排序。

结果

在第一份调查中,共提出了 937 个主题。其中近一半(430 个,占 46%)被确定为与牙髓学、龋病学、口腔医学/外科学或牙齿修复相关的主题。这些主题被分为 84 个研究主题,涵盖 10 个研究领域。共有 235 名 OHP 对这些主题进行了优先排序。行为改变对口腔健康和老年患者的口腔保健被认为是最重要的。

结论

与 OHP 的协商制定了研究议程,可以为未来的口腔健康研究提供信息。优先级最高的研究主题具有跨学科性质,主要关注口腔疾病预防,在当前的口腔保健研究组合中代表性不足。

相似文献

1
Research priorities for oral healthcare: agenda setting from the practitioners' perspective.口腔保健研究重点:从从业者的角度制定议程。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2021 Aug;79(6):451-457. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1887929. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model-patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners.利用对话模式为口腔保健制定研究议程——患者与从业者共同参与制定研究议程。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Feb;130(1):e12842. doi: 10.1111/eos.12842. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
4
Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders.确定糖尿病研究的目标行为优先级:运用名义群体技术达成关键利益相关者的共识。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 6;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9. eCollection 2016.
5
Health systems research in fragile and conflict-affected states: a research agenda-setting exercise.脆弱和受冲突影响国家的卫生系统研究:一项研究议程设定活动。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 21;14(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0124-1.
6
What matters most to patients about primary healthcare: mixed-methods patient priority setting exercises within the PREFeR (PRioritiEs For Research) project.患者对初级医疗保健最关心的是什么:在 PREFeR(研究优先事项)项目中使用混合方法进行患者优先事项设定练习。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e025954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025954.
7
Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID.长新冠公民科学家:受长新冠影响人群制定基于需求的研究议程。
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00579-7. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff.确定英国养老院老年人护理的一系列研究重点:一项与养老院工作人员开展的改良德尔菲共识研究
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):284-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw204.
9
A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study.荷兰院前紧急医疗服务的国家研究议程:一项德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 8;24:2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0195-y.
10
Top research priorities for preterm birth: results of a prioritisation partnership between people affected by preterm birth and healthcare professionals.早产重点研究议题:受早产影响的人群与医疗保健专业人员之间的优先伙伴关系的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2654-3.

引用本文的文献

1
'Whose role is it anyway?' Experiences of community nurses in the delivery and support of oral health care for older people living at home: a grounded theory study.“到底是谁的职责?”社区护士为居家老年人提供口腔保健及支持的经历:一项扎根理论研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 5;22(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01533-0.
2
Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model-patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners.利用对话模式为口腔保健制定研究议程——患者与从业者共同参与制定研究议程。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Feb;130(1):e12842. doi: 10.1111/eos.12842. Epub 2021 Dec 22.