Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J Orthop Res. 2022 Jan;40(1):105-116. doi: 10.1002/jor.25016. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Sensorimotor deficits, particularly proprioceptive, are often reported following rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). High secondary injury rates and long-term negative consequences suggest that these deficits are not properly identified using current assessment methods. We explored a novel obstacle clearance test to evaluate sensorimotor control in individuals following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and rehabilitation. Thirty-seven post-ACLR individuals, 23 nonathletic asymptomatic controls (CTRL), and 18 elite athletes stepped over a hurdle-shaped obstacle, downward vision occluded, aiming for minimal clearance. Kinematic outcomes (3D motion capture) for the leading and trailing legs, for two unpredictably presented obstacle heights, were categorized into Accuracy: vertical foot clearance and minimal distance from the obstacle; Variability: end-point and hip/knee trajectory; and Symmetry: trunk/hip/knee crossing angles, hip-knee-ankle movement, and velocity curves. Accuracy was worse for CTRL compared with both other groups. ACLR had less leading and trailing vertical foot clearance with their injured compared with their noninjured leg. ACLR and athletes had less crossing knee flexion in their injured/nondominant legs compared with their contralateral leg, both leading and trailing. ACLR showed greater trunk flexion when crossing with their injured leg, both leading and trailing. For the leading leg, ACLR showed greater asymmetry for the hip-knee-ankle velocity curve compared with elite athletes. Trailing leg trajectory variability was lower for ACLR compared with CTRL and athletes for higher obstacles. Clinical significance: Sensorimotor deficits in individuals post-ACLR were reflected by greater asymmetry and less variable (more stereotypical) trajectories rather than limb positioning ability. This consideration should be addressed in clinical evaluations.
本体感觉运动缺陷,尤其是本体感觉,在前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂后常被报道。高二次损伤率和长期负面后果表明,这些缺陷并未通过当前的评估方法得到正确识别。我们探索了一种新的障碍物清除测试,以评估 ACL 重建(ACLR)和康复后个体的感觉运动控制。37 名 ACLR 后个体、23 名非运动无症状对照者(CTRL)和 18 名精英运动员在闭眼的情况下,越过一个障碍形障碍物,目标是最小间隙。两条腿的运动学结果(3D 运动捕捉),用于两个不可预测的障碍物高度,分为准确性:垂直足间隙和最小距离障碍物;变异性:终点和髋/膝轨迹;对称性:躯干/髋/膝交叉角度、髋膝踝运动和速度曲线。与其他两组相比,CTRL 的准确性较差。与未受伤的腿相比,ACLR 受伤的腿和未受伤的腿的垂直足间隙较小。与对侧腿相比,ACLR 和运动员受伤/非优势腿的受伤腿和非受伤腿的膝关节交叉屈曲较小。ACLR 用受伤的腿交叉时,躯干弯曲更大,无论是领先腿还是滞后腿。与精英运动员相比,ACLR 领先腿的髋关节-膝关节-踝关节速度曲线的对称性更大。与 CTRL 和运动员相比,较高障碍物时 ACLR 的滞后腿轨迹变异性较低。临床意义:ACL 后个体的感觉运动缺陷反映在更大的不对称性和更可变(更刻板)的轨迹上,而不是肢体定位能力。在临床评估中应考虑到这一点。