Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Geriatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Mar;2(3):e163-e170. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00006-4. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the scarcity of resources has necessitated triage of critical care for patients with the disease. In patients aged 65 years and older, triage decisions are regularly based on degree of frailty measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). However, the CFS could also be useful in patients younger than 65 years. We aimed to examine the association between CFS score and hospital mortality and between CFS score and admission to intensive care in adult patients of all ages with COVID-19 across Europe.
This analysis was part of the COVID Medication (COMET) study, an international, multicentre, retrospective observational cohort study in 63 hospitals in 11 countries in Europe. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, had been admitted to hospital, and either tested positive by PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or were judged to have a high clinical likelihood of having SARS-CoV-2 infection by the local COVID-19 expert team. CFS was used to assess level of frailty: fit (CFS), mildly frail (CFS), or frail (CFS). The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was admission to intensive care. Data were analysed using a multivariable binary logistic regression model adjusted for covariates (age, sex, number of drugs prescribed, and type of drug class as a proxy for comorbidities).
Between March 30 and July 15, 2020, 2434 patients (median age 68 years [IQR 55-77]; 1480 [61%] men, 954 [30%] women) had CFS scores available and were included in the analyses. In the total sample and in patients aged 65 years and older, frail patients and mildly frail patients had a significantly higher risk of hospital mortality than fit patients (total sample: CFS CFS odds ratio [OR] 2·71 [95% CI 2·04-3·60], p<0·0001 and CFS CFS OR 1·54 [1·16-2·06], p=0·0030; age ≥65 years: CFS CFS OR 2·90 [2·12-3·97], p<0·0001 and CFS CFS OR 1·64 [1·20-2·25], p=0·0020). In patients younger than 65 years, an increased hospital mortality risk was only observed in frail patients (CFS CFS OR 2·22 [1·08-4·57], p=0·030; CFS CFS OR 1·08 [0·48-2·39], p=0·86). Frail patients had a higher incidence of admission to intensive care than fit patients (CFS CFS OR 1·54 [1·21-1·97], p=0·0010), whereas mildly frail patients had a lower incidence than fit patients (CFS CFS OR 0·71 [0·55-0·92], p=0·0090). Among patients younger than 65 years, frail patients had an increased incidence of admission to intensive care (CFS CFS OR 2·96 [1·98-4·43], p<0·0001), whereas mildly frail patients had no significant difference in incidence compared with fit patients (CFS CFS OR 0·93 [0·63-1·38], p=0·72). Among patients aged 65 years and older, frail patients had no significant difference in the incidence of admission to intensive care compared with fit patients (CFS CFS OR 1·27 [0·92-1·75], p=0·14), whereas mildly frail patients had a lower incidence than fit patients (CFS CFS OR 0·66 [0·47-0·93], p=0·018).
The results of this study suggest that CFS score is a suitable risk marker for hospital mortality in adult patients with COVID-19. However, treatment decisions based on the CFS in patients younger than 65 years should be made with caution.
LOEY Foundation.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,资源的稀缺性使得对患有该病的重症患者进行重症监护的分诊成为必要。在 65 岁及以上的患者中,分诊决策通常基于临床虚弱量表(CFS)测量的虚弱程度。然而,CFS 也可能对 65 岁以下的患者有用。我们旨在研究 CFS 评分与医院死亡率之间的关联,以及 CFS 评分与所有年龄段患有 COVID-19 的成年患者入住重症监护病房之间的关联,该研究在欧洲 63 家医院的 11 个国家进行。
该分析是 COVID 药物(COMET)研究的一部分,这是一项国际性、多中心、回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 63 家医院的 2434 名年龄在 18 岁及以上、已住院并通过 PCR 检测到严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)呈阳性或由当地 COVID-19 专家团队判断具有 SARS-CoV-2 感染高临床可能性的患者。CFS 用于评估虚弱程度:健康(CFS)、轻度虚弱(CFS)或虚弱(CFS)。主要结局是医院死亡率。次要结局是入住重症监护病房。使用多变量二项逻辑回归模型调整了协变量(年龄、性别、开的药物数量和药物类别作为合并症的代表)进行数据分析。
在 2020 年 3 月 30 日至 7 月 15 日期间,2434 名患者(中位年龄 68 岁[IQR 55-77];1480 名[61%]男性,954 名[30%]女性)的 CFS 评分可用,并纳入了分析。在总样本和 65 岁及以上的患者中,虚弱患者和轻度虚弱患者的医院死亡率显著高于健康患者(总样本:CFS CFS 比值比[OR]2.71[95%CI 2.04-3.60],p<0.0001 和 CFS CFS OR 1.54[1.16-2.06],p=0.0030;年龄≥65 岁:CFS CFS OR 2.90[2.12-3.97],p<0.0001 和 CFS CFS OR 1.64[1.20-2.25],p=0.0020)。在 65 岁以下的患者中,仅观察到虚弱患者的医院死亡率风险增加(CFS CFS OR 2.22[1.08-4.57],p=0.030;CFS CFS OR 1.08[0.48-2.39],p=0.86)。虚弱患者入住重症监护病房的发生率高于健康患者(CFS CFS OR 1.54[1.21-1.97],p=0.0010),而轻度虚弱患者的入住率低于健康患者(CFS CFS OR 0.71[0.55-0.92],p=0.0090)。在 65 岁以下的患者中,虚弱患者入住重症监护病房的发生率增加(CFS CFS OR 2.96[1.98-4.43],p<0.0001),而轻度虚弱患者与健康患者相比,入住率无显著差异(CFS CFS OR 0.93[0.63-1.38],p=0.72)。在 65 岁及以上的患者中,虚弱患者入住重症监护病房的发生率与健康患者相比无显著差异(CFS CFS OR 1.27[0.92-1.75],p=0.14),而轻度虚弱患者的入住率低于健康患者(CFS CFS OR 0.66[0.47-0.93],p=0.018)。
这项研究的结果表明,CFS 评分是 COVID-19 成年患者医院死亡率的合适风险标志物。然而,对于 65 岁以下的患者,应谨慎根据 CFS 做出治疗决策。
LOEY 基金会。