Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Drs Beauchamp and de Guise and Ms Audrit); Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Dr de Guise and Ms Audrit); Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Dr Beauchamp); Traumatic Brain Injury Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Drs Tinawi, Laguë-Beauvais, and Saluja); and Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Drs de Guise and Saluja).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(4):E249-E261. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000653.
To estimate feasibility and explore the treatment effect of a psychoeducative and counseling intervention program targeting 4 postconcussion symptoms (SAAM: Sleep/fatigue, Attention, Anxiety/mood, Memory).
Level 1 trauma center.
Twenty-five patients with postconcussion symptoms enrolled 1 to 3 months post-accident.
Parallel-group (experimental and wait-list control), randomized controlled trial, with masked outcome assessment the week following the last intervention session. The Experimental group received the SAAM intervention (1 session/week during 4 weeks); care as usual was maintained for both groups.
Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ).
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A/-D); Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI); attention and memory neuropsychological battery; Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ).
A 10-item satisfaction questionnaire for the experimental group.
15.67% of the participants evaluated for eligibility were randomized and completed the evaluation at T0. High rates of satisfaction regarding the SAAM intervention were found in the experimental group (n = 10). One participant (experimental group) withdrew after T0. Exploratory results showed that the group × time interaction was not significant, but had a large effect size for the RPQ (P = .051, η2 = .16) and HADS-D (P = .052, η2 = 0.17), and a significant interaction was found with a large effect size for the PSQI (P = .017, η2 = .24) and MFI (P = .041, η2 = .18). Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant reduction of these variables post-intervention. No significant group × time interaction was observed for cognitive measures and CIQ.
The pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and tolerability of the SAAM intervention. Preliminary data suggest that SAAM intervention delivered post-acutely might reduce postconcussion symptoms, depression symptoms, fatigue, and sleep difficulties. A larger scale randomized control trial is warranted to confirm these promising results.
评估针对 4 种脑震荡后症状(SAAM:睡眠/疲劳、注意力、焦虑/情绪、记忆)的心理教育和咨询干预方案的可行性,并探索其治疗效果。
1 级创伤中心。
25 名脑震荡后症状患者,在事故后 1 至 3 个月入组。
平行组(实验组和等待名单对照组)、随机对照试验,在最后一次干预后一周进行盲法结局评估。实验组接受 SAAM 干预(每周 1 次,共 4 周);两组均维持常规护理。
Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)。
医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS-A/-D);匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI);多维疲劳量表(MFI);注意力和记忆神经心理学测试;社区整合问卷(CIQ)。
实验组的 10 项满意度问卷。
符合纳入标准的参与者中有 15.67%被随机分配,并在 T0 时完成了评估。实验组对 SAAM 干预的满意度很高(n=10)。一名参与者(实验组)在 T0 后退出。探索性结果表明,组×时间交互作用不显著,但 RPQ(P=.051,η2=.16)和 HADS-D(P=.052,η2= 0.17)的组间时间交互作用具有大效应量,PSQI(P=.017,η2=.24)和 MFI(P=.041,η2=.18)的交互作用具有显著意义和大效应量。干预后这些变量显著减少。认知测量和 CIQ 未观察到显著的组间时间交互作用。
该初步研究表明 SAAM 干预具有可行性和可耐受性。初步数据表明,急性脑震荡后即刻给予 SAAM 干预可能会减轻脑震荡后症状、抑郁症状、疲劳和睡眠困难。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来证实这些有希望的结果。