Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
W.H. Bryan Mining and Geology Research Centre, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, 40 Isles Road Indooroopilly, Brisbane, QLD, 4068, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84897-0.
Tailings facility failures represent a significant risk to the environment and communities globally, but until now little data was available on the global distribution of risks and characteristics of facilities to ensure proper governance. We conducted a survey and compiled a database with information on tailings facilities disclosed by extractive companies at the request of institutional investors. Despite limitations in the data, this information disclosure request represents the most comprehensive survey of tailings facilities ever undertaken. The compiled dataset includes 1743 tailings facilities and provides insights into a range of topics including construction method, stability, consequence of failure, stored volume, and the rate of uptake of alternative technologies to dewater tailings and reduce geotechnical risk. Our analysis reveals that 10 per cent of tailings facilities reported notable stability concerns or failure to be confirmed or certified as stable at some point in their history, with distinct trends according to construction method, governance, age, height, volume and seismic hazard. Controversy has surrounded the safety of tailings facilities, most notably upstream facilities, for many years but in the absence of definitive empirical data differentiating the risks of different facility types, upstream facilities have continued to be used widely by the industry and a consensus has emerged that upstream facilities can theoretically be built safely under the right circumstances. Our findings reveal that in practice active upstream facilities report a higher incidence of stability issues (18.3%) than other facility types, and that this elevated risk persists even when these facilities are built in high governance settings. In-pit/natural landform and dry-stack facilities report lower incidence of stability issues, though the rate of stability issues is significant by engineering standards (> 2 per cent) across all construction methods, highlighting the universal importance of careful facility management and governance. The insights reported here can assist the global governance of tailings facility stability risks.
尾矿库设施故障对全球环境和社区构成重大风险,但迄今为止,关于风险的全球分布和设施特征的数据很少,无法确保进行适当的治理。我们根据机构投资者的要求,对矿业公司披露的尾矿库设施信息进行了调查和编制数据库。尽管数据存在局限性,但这项信息披露请求代表了有史以来对尾矿库设施最全面的调查。该汇编数据集包括 1743 个尾矿库设施,并深入了解了一系列主题,包括建造方法、稳定性、故障后果、储存量以及采用替代技术对尾矿进行脱水和降低岩土工程风险的速度。我们的分析表明,10%的尾矿库设施报告存在明显的稳定性问题或在其历史上的某个时间点被证实或被确认为不稳定,其趋势与建造方法、治理、年龄、高度、体积和地震危险等因素有关。多年来,尾矿库设施的安全性一直存在争议,尤其是上游设施,但由于缺乏明确的区分不同设施类型风险的经验数据,上游设施在该行业仍被广泛使用,并且出现了一种共识,即在适当的情况下,理论上可以安全地建造上游设施。我们的研究结果表明,实际上,活跃的上游设施稳定性问题的发生率(18.3%)高于其他设施类型,即使在高治理环境中建造这些设施,这种风险仍然存在。坑内/天然地形和干式堆存设施报告的稳定性问题发生率较低,但所有建造方法的稳定性问题发生率都达到了工程标准(>2%),这突显了精心的设施管理和治理的普遍重要性。这里报告的见解可以帮助尾矿库设施稳定性风险的全球治理。