Suppr超能文献

双动全髋关节置换术:解决不稳定问题并提供接近正常的活动范围。

Dual mobility THR: Resolving instability and providing near normal range of movement.

作者信息

Agarwala Sanjay, Shetty Vivek, Taywade Shounak, Vijayvargiya Mayank, Bhingraj Mahmoud

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Aug 28;13:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.023. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dislocation is a common complication of Total Hip Replacement (THR), particularly when performed in primary (indications with increased risk of instability) and in revision scenarios. Dual mobility THR (DMTHR) minimizes the risk of instability in such scenarios, however most of the evidence is from western literature. Results of DMTHR in Indian scenarios where patient want to go back to their normal routine activities of squatting and sitting cross-legged is lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the short to mid-term results of DMTHR for varied indications (both primary and revision) in Indian scenario. To evaluate the outcome of the DMTHR in terms of functional range of motion and the ability to go back to their pre-injury level of activity.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 150 patients operated with DMTHR between January 2015 to February 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were evaluated clinically using Modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), Range of Motion (ROM), and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) like ability to squat and sit cross legged. Radiological evaluation was done using radiographs to assess loosening, stress shielding, osteolysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow up in our study was 25.2 months (Range 12-46 months). Mean Modified HHS was 71.8 ± 8.11 at 6 weeks post-op and 85.8 ± 7.62 at last follow-up. HHS showed excellent outcome in 36 hips (26.7%), good outcome in 76 hips (56.7%), fair outcome in 20 hips (14.6%), poor outcome in 3 hips (2%). All our patients were allowed to squat and sit cross-legged at a mean follow-up period of 13 weeks (8 weeks-20 weeks) except 10 cases of Revision THR where patients were advised not to squat or sit cross-legged. All patients were able to resume their activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

DMTHR in patients of all ages has shown a good short to midterm clinical outcome which is comparable to conventional THR. It confers the benefit of stability allowing our patients to squat and sit cross legged which is often one of the expectation and requirement of a patient undergoing THR in India. DMTHR in both primary and revision scenarios exhibit a low risk of dislocation, complications and revision surgery.

摘要

背景

脱位是全髋关节置换术(THR)的常见并发症,尤其是在初次置换(不稳定风险增加的适应症)和翻修手术中。双动全髋关节置换术(DMTHR)可将此类情况下的不稳定风险降至最低,然而大多数证据来自西方文献。在印度的情况下,患者希望恢复蹲坐和盘腿等正常日常活动,关于DMTHR的结果尚缺乏相关研究。我们研究的目的是评估在印度情况下,DMTHR用于各种适应症(包括初次置换和翻修)的短期至中期结果。评估DMTHR在功能活动范围以及恢复到受伤前活动水平方面的效果。

方法

这是一项对2015年1月至2019年2月期间接受DMTHR手术的150例患者的回顾性研究,最短随访时间为12个月。使用改良Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、活动范围(ROM)以及患者报告的结局指标(PROM)如蹲坐和盘腿能力对患者进行临床评估。通过X线片进行放射学评估,以评估松动、应力遮挡、骨溶解情况。

结果

我们研究中的平均随访时间为25.2个月(范围12 - 46个月)。术后6周时平均改良HHS为71.8 ± 8.11,末次随访时为85.8 ± 7.62。HHS显示36髋(26.7%)结果优秀,76髋(56.7%)结果良好,20髋(14.6%)结果尚可,3髋(2%)结果较差。除10例翻修THR患者被建议不要蹲坐或盘腿外,所有患者在平均随访13周(8周 - 20周)时都能蹲坐和盘腿。所有患者都能够恢复日常生活活动。

结论

各年龄段患者的DMTHR均显示出良好的短期至中期临床结果,与传统THR相当。它具有稳定性优势,使我们的患者能够蹲坐和盘腿,这通常是印度接受THR患者的期望和需求之一。初次置换和翻修手术中的DMTHR脱位、并发症及翻修手术风险均较低。

相似文献

1
Dual mobility THR: Resolving instability and providing near normal range of movement.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Aug 28;13:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.023. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years' follow-up.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Feb;97(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.08.003. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Determination of outcomes of complex upper end tibial fractures in squatting and cross leg sitting South Asian population.
Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1569-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
5
Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Mar;16(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0324-9. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
8
Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2245-2251. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4209-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
9
Dual-mobility bearings for patients with abductor-trochanteric complex insufficiency.
Hip Int. 2018 Sep;28(5):491-497. doi: 10.1177/1120700018757788. Epub 2018 May 20.

本文引用的文献

2
Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
3
Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review.
Arthroplast Today. 2017 Feb 5;3(3):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.12.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision.
Int Orthop. 2017 Mar;41(3):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3328-7. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Lack of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty with a new dual mobility acetabular design.
Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):34-8. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000186. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
8
Dual mobility bearings withstand loading from steeper cup-inclinations without substantial wear.
J Orthop Res. 2015 Mar;33(3):398-404. doi: 10.1002/jor.22774. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Evora® chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years' follow-up.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):923-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验