Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Computer, Electrical, and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;9:623966. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.623966. eCollection 2021.
Kidney Exchange Programs can play an important role to increase access to the life saving and most cost-effective treatment for End Stage Renal Disease. The rise of national KEPs in Europe brings a need for standardized performance reporting to facilitate the development of an international evidence base on program practices. We systematically searched and reviewed the literature to extract kidney exchange program performance measures. Reported measures were initially categorized as structure, process, and outcome measures. Expert feedback was used to redefine categories and extend the set of measures to be considered. Using the Delphi method and a panel of 10 experts, the resulting measures were subsequently classified as mandatory (Base set), optional (Extended set), or deleted. Out of the initial 1,668 articles identified by systematic literature search, 21 European publications on kidney exchange programs were included to collect performance measures, accompanied by three national program reports. The final measurement categories were Context, Population, Enrollment, Matching, Transplantation, and Outcomes. The set of performance measures resulting from the literature review was modified and classified as mandatory or optional. The resulting Base set and Extended set form the kidney exchange program reporting standard. The evidence-based and consensus-based kidney exchange program reporting standard can harmonize practical and scientific reporting on kidney exchange programs, thus facilitating the advancement of national programs. In addition, the kidney exchange program reporting standard can promote and align cross-national programs.
肾脏交换计划可以在增加获得挽救生命和最具成本效益的终末期肾病治疗机会方面发挥重要作用。欧洲国家肾脏交换计划的兴起需要标准化的绩效报告,以促进关于计划实践的国际循证基础的发展。我们系统地搜索和审查了文献,以提取肾脏交换计划的绩效衡量标准。报告的衡量标准最初被归类为结构、过程和结果衡量标准。专家反馈用于重新定义类别并扩展要考虑的衡量标准集。使用德尔菲法和一个由 10 名专家组成的小组,随后将这些衡量标准分类为强制性(基础集)、可选(扩展集)或删除。从系统文献检索中最初确定的 1668 篇文章中,纳入了 21 篇关于肾脏交换计划的欧洲出版物,以收集绩效衡量标准,并附有三份国家计划报告。最终的测量类别是背景、人群、登记、匹配、移植和结果。文献综述产生的绩效衡量标准经过修改和分类,分为强制性或可选性。由此产生的基础集和扩展集构成了肾脏交换计划报告标准。基于证据和共识的肾脏交换计划报告标准可以协调肾脏交换计划的实践和科学报告,从而促进国家计划的发展。此外,肾脏交换计划报告标准可以促进和协调跨国计划。