Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Microsurgery. 2021 May;41(4):319-326. doi: 10.1002/micr.30727. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
Recently, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard for breast reconstruction, but it has some drawbacks such as abdominal bulging and hernia. To overcome these disadvantages, the superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator (SIEA) flap is used as an alternative option, but it has another problem, namely limited vascular territory and risk of vascular thrombosis. To solve these problems, we introduced our new technique, a combined SIEA and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) based double pedicled abdominal flap. In this report, we present our experience of using this technique.
The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap was used in five patients who wanted to have unilateral breast reconstruction after a mastectomy due to breast cancer. The average age was 48.2 (range 38-56) years, and the average BMI was 24.4 (range 19.2-31.4). The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap was designed as a modified DIEP flap, and all flaps were placed in the vertical setting. The flap pedicles had two different vascular supplies, SIEA and SCIA, and the drainage systems, SIEV and SCIV, anastomosed to the internal mammary artery and vein in all cases.
The harvested SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flaps were a median volume of 925 g (range 452-1570 g) and average size of 491 cm (range 440-611 cm ). The average reconstructive time was 7:41 (range 6:31-9:17). In four out of the five cases, the SIEA and SCIA joined together to make a common pedicle artery trunk, and its average size was 1.08 mm. Four out of the five cases had a wide vascular territory crossing the abdominal midline as shown by ICG angiography. One case showed ICG fluorescence for the hemi-side of the abdominal flap. Postoperative course was uneventful, and there were no major perioperative complications, which need extra surgical procedures. Follow-up period averaged 273 days (range 194-312 days).
The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap showed viable flap territory across the midline in all cases. The SIEA and SCIP based double pedicled abdominal flap might be another ideal option for breast reconstruction, when appropriate SIEA and SCIA pedicles are identified, and an adequate ICG fluorescence is obtained for the size of flap needed.
最近,深下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)已成为乳房重建的金标准,但它存在一些缺点,如腹部膨隆和疝。为了克服这些缺点,使用了腹壁浅动脉穿支(SIEA)皮瓣作为替代方案,但它存在另一个问题,即血管蒂有限和血管血栓形成的风险。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了我们的新技术,即基于 SIEA 和旋髂浅动脉穿支(SCIP)的双蒂腹部皮瓣。在本报告中,我们介绍了使用该技术的经验。
在 5 名因乳腺癌接受乳房切除术并希望进行单侧乳房重建的患者中使用了基于 SIEA 和 SCIP 的双蒂腹部皮瓣。平均年龄为 48.2 岁(范围 38-56 岁),平均 BMI 为 24.4(范围 19.2-31.4)。基于 SIEA 和 SCIP 的双蒂腹部皮瓣设计为改良的 DIEP 皮瓣,所有皮瓣均采用垂直设置。皮瓣蒂有两种不同的血管供应,SIEA 和 SCIA,以及引流系统,SIEV 和 SCIV,在所有病例中均与内乳动脉和静脉吻合。
所采集的基于 SIEA 和 SCIP 的双蒂腹部皮瓣的体积中位数为 925g(范围 452-1570g),平均大小为 491cm(范围 440-611cm)。平均重建时间为 7:41(范围 6:31-9:17)。在 5 例中有 4 例 SIEA 和 SCIA 结合在一起形成共同的蒂动脉干,其平均大小为 1.08mm。5 例中有 4 例通过 ICG 血管造影显示腹部中线的广泛血管蒂。1 例显示腹部皮瓣的半侧 ICG 荧光。术后过程平稳,无重大围手术期并发症,无需额外手术。随访时间平均为 273 天(范围 194-312 天)。
基于 SIEA 和 SCIP 的双蒂腹部皮瓣在所有病例中均显示出跨越中线的可行皮瓣区域。当适当识别 SIEA 和 SCIA 蒂时,并获得所需皮瓣大小的足够 ICG 荧光时,基于 SIEA 和 SCIP 的双蒂腹部皮瓣可能成为乳房重建的另一个理想选择。