Department of Endocrinology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.
School of Medical Technology and Engineering, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China.
Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1540-1557. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab002.
Osteoporosis is a global health issue among the aging population. The effect of the acid or base interventions on bone health remains controversial. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate effects of acidic diets and alkaline supplements on bone health simultaneously. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in 5 available databases and 1 registered clinical trial system to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed effects of the acid-base intervention on bone health. Depending on heterogeneity across studies, the pooled effects were calculated by fixed-effects or random-effects models. The present study included 13 acidic diet intervention studies and 13 alkaline supplement studies for final quantitative assessments. The meta-analysis showed that acidic diets significantly increased net acid excretion [NAE; standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.99; P = 0.003] and urinary calcium excretion (SMD = 0.47, P < 0.00001) but had no significant effect on bone turnover markers and bone mineral density (BMD). On the other hand, alkaline supplement intervention significantly reduced NAE (SMD = -1.29, P < 0.00001), urinary calcium excretion (SMD = -0.44, P = 0.007), bone resorption marker aminoterminal cross-linking telopeptide (NTX; SMD = -0.29, P = 0.003), and bone formation marker osteocalcin (OC; SMD = -0.23, P = 0.02), but did not affect the other bone turnover markers. Furthermore, alkaline supplements significantly increased BMD in femoral neck [mean difference (MD) = 1.62, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%], lumbar spine (MD = 1.66, P < 0.00001, I2 = 87%), and total hip (MD = 0.98, P = 0.02, I2 = 99%). Subsequently, meta-regression analyses identified 1 study that substantially contributed to the high heterogeneity of BMD in the latter 2 sites, but sensitivity analysis suggested that this study did not affect the significant pooled effects. Despite that, the results should be interpreted with caution and need to be further validated by a larger RCT. In summary, through integrating evidence from RCTs, the present meta-analysis initially suggests that alkaline supplements may be beneficial to bone metabolism and acidic diets may not be harmful to bone health. This work may be clinically useful for both clinicians and patients with osteoporosis.
骨质疏松症是老龄化人口中的一个全球性健康问题。酸或碱干预对骨骼健康的影响仍然存在争议。本研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以同时研究酸性饮食和碱性补充剂对骨骼健康的影响。我们在 5 个可用数据库和 1 个已注册的临床试验系统中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评估酸碱干预对骨骼健康影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据研究之间的异质性,通过固定效应或随机效应模型计算合并效应。本研究包括 13 项酸性饮食干预研究和 13 项碱性补充研究进行最终定量评估。荟萃分析表明,酸性饮食显著增加净酸排泄[NAE;标准化均数差(SMD)= 2.99;P = 0.003]和尿钙排泄(SMD = 0.47,P < 0.00001),但对骨转换标志物和骨密度(BMD)没有显著影响。另一方面,碱性补充剂干预显著降低 NAE(SMD = -1.29,P < 0.00001)、尿钙排泄(SMD = -0.44,P = 0.007)、骨吸收标志物氨基端交联端肽(NTX;SMD = -0.29,P = 0.003)和骨形成标志物骨钙素(OC;SMD = -0.23,P = 0.02),但对其他骨转换标志物没有影响。此外,碱性补充剂显著增加股骨颈[平均差异(MD)= 1.62,P < 0.00001,I2 = 0%]、腰椎[MD = 1.66,P < 0.00001,I2 = 87%]和全髋[MD = 0.98,P = 0.02,I2 = 99%]的 BMD。随后,元回归分析确定了 1 项研究对后两个部位 BMD 的高度异质性有显著贡献,但敏感性分析表明,该研究并未影响显著的合并效应。尽管如此,结果的解释仍需谨慎,并需要更大规模的 RCT 进一步验证。总之,通过整合 RCT 的证据,本荟萃分析初步表明碱性补充剂可能有益于骨代谢,而酸性饮食可能对骨骼健康无害。这项工作可能对临床医生和骨质疏松症患者都具有临床意义。