Ultrasound Elastography in the Assessment of the Stiffness of Spastic Muscles: A Systematic Review.

The incidence of muscle spasticity is high in patients with diseases of the central nervous system. This condition leads to significant limitations in movement and impaired functional capacities. Muscle spasticity manifests as changes in the mechanical properties of the muscles. This muscle disorder is generally assessed using qualitative methods, whose validity, reliability and sensitivity are questionable. In recent years, ultrasound elastography (USE) has been used as a non-invasive technique for characterizing the stress response and mechanical properties of individual muscles in the evaluation of spasticity. This article presents a systematic review of the USE techniques, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration guidelines, used for the evaluation of muscle stiffness caused by spasticity. The articles selected in this study were evaluated using the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) tool. Mainly, studies on the assessment of spasticity involving the evaluation of muscle stiffness with USE techniques (i.e., shear-wave elastography [SWE] or compression elastography [CE]) were selected. Then, common topics related to the assessment of spastic muscles and the statistical results of these studies were classified. Of 21 articles, nine used only CE, 10 used only SWE and two used both techniques. In the studies, statistically significant differences were observed in the measurements of muscle stiffness between the paretic and non-paretic sides as well as between patients and healthy patients. The clinical measurements obtained, devices used and assessment and probe positions for both techniques were discussed. The most frequently studied muscles were the biceps (n = 7) and gastrocnemius (n = 11). On applying the QAREL tool, we found that only two studies showed compliance at 80%-90%, seven studies at 50%-70% and the remaining 12 at 10%-40%. The results showed that USE techniques have limitations in spasticity assessment, such as subjectivity because of the lack of standardized protocols. A deficit of studies on intra-operator and inter-operator measurements indicates that this technique is not yet mature for spasticity diagnosis, although it is a promising diagnostic tool for designing treatment plans and monitoring the effectiveness of therapeutic modalities.