Department of Psychology, 6249Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Psychol Rep. 2022 Jun;125(3):1380-1396. doi: 10.1177/0033294120988135. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
People who have a high degree of autistic traits often underperform on theory of mind tasks such as perspective-taking or facial emotion recognition compared to those with lower levels of autistic traits. However, some research suggests that this may not be the case if the agent they are evaluating is anthropomorphic (i.e. animal or cartoon) rather than typically human. The present studies examined the relation between facial emotion recognition and autistic trait profiles in over 750 adults using either a standard or cartoon version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) test. Results showed that those scoring above the clinical cut off for autistic traits on the Autism Quotient performed significantly worse than those with the lowest levels of autistic traits on the standard RME, while scores across these groups did not differ substantially on the cartoon version of the task. These findings add further evidence that theory of mind ability such as facial emotion recognition is not at a global deficit in those with a high degree of autistic traits. Instead, differences in this ability may be specific to evaluating human agents.
具有高度自闭症特质的人在心理理论任务(例如换位思考或面部情绪识别)中的表现往往不如自闭症特质较低的人。然而,如果他们评估的对象是拟人化的(即动物或卡通)而不是典型的人类,那么情况可能并非如此。本研究使用标准或卡通版的“读心术眼测试”(Reading the Mind in the Eyes test,简称 RME),在超过 750 名成年人中检查了面部情绪识别与自闭症特质档案之间的关系。结果表明,在自闭症商数(Autism Quotient)上得分高于自闭症特质临床截止值的人在标准 RME 上的表现明显差于自闭症特质最低的人,而在任务的卡通版上,这些组的得分差异并不显著。这些发现进一步证明,具有高度自闭症特质的人在心理理论能力(例如面部情绪识别)方面并非整体存在缺陷。相反,这种能力的差异可能特定于评估人类代理。