Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Dr, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):e72-e79. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88601.
To examine differences in health care costs associated with choice of second-line antidiabetes medication (ADM) for commercially insured adults with type 2 diabetes.
Retrospective cohort study with multiple pretests and posttests.
Included patients initiated second-line ADM therapy between 2011 and 2015, with variable follow-up through 2017. The 6 index medication classes were sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), basal insulin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs). Multivariable regression models compared between-class changes in adjusted quarterly costs after second-line ADM initiation.
The study cohort included 34,963 adults. Most were prescribed a sulfonylurea (46.0%) or DPP-4 inhibitor (30.4%). Adjusted quarterly index medication costs were significantly higher for all patients receiving nonsulfonylurea medications, ranging from $108 (95% CI, $99-$118) for TZDs to $742 (95% CI, $720-$765) for GLP-1 RAs. Changes in quarterly total health care costs were significantly higher for all nonsulfonylurea classes. Conversely, changes in quarterly nonpharmacy medical costs were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$67; 95% CI, -$92 to -$43), GLP-1 RAs (-$43; 95% CI, -$85 to -$1), and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$46; 95% CI, -$87 to -$6); changes in all other quarterly costs besides the index medication were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$60; 95% CI, -$94 to -$26) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$113; 95% CI, -$169 to -$57).
The higher cost of nonsulfonylurea medications was the main driver of relative increases in total costs. Relative decreases in nonpharmacy medical costs among patients receiving newer ADM classes reflect these medications' potential value.
研究 2 型糖尿病商业保险患者二线抗糖尿病药物(ADM)选择与医疗费用的差异。
多前测和后测的回顾性队列研究。
纳入 2011 年至 2015 年期间接受二线 ADM 治疗的患者,并在 2017 年进行了不同时间的随访。6 种一线药物类别为磺酰脲类、二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)、基础胰岛素、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和噻唑烷二酮类(TZDs)。二线 ADM 起始后,采用多变量回归模型比较不同类别调整后每季度成本的变化。
研究队列纳入了 34963 名成年人。大多数患者处方磺酰脲类(46.0%)或 DPP-4 抑制剂(30.4%)。所有接受非磺酰脲类药物治疗的患者,其每季度指数药物费用均显著升高,从 TZDs 的 108 美元(95%CI,99-118 美元)到 GLP-1 RAs 的 742 美元(95%CI,720-765 美元)不等。所有非磺酰脲类药物类别每季度总医疗费用的变化均显著升高。相反,接受 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗的患者(-67 美元;95%CI,-92 至-43 美元)、GLP-1 RAs(-43 美元;95%CI,-85 至-1 美元)和 SGLT-2 抑制剂(-46 美元;95%CI,-87 至-6 美元)的每季度非药物医疗费用显著降低;接受 DPP-4 抑制剂和 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗的患者,除指数药物外,所有其他季度成本均显著降低(DPP-4 抑制剂-60 美元;95%CI,-94 至-26 美元;SGLT-2 抑制剂-113 美元;95%CI,-169 至-57 美元)。
非磺酰脲类药物的高成本是总费用相对增加的主要驱动因素。接受新型 ADM 类药物治疗的患者非药物医疗成本相对下降反映了这些药物的潜在价值。