Suppr超能文献

共同创建身体活动干预措施:一种混合方法评估途径。

Co-creating physical activity interventions: a mixed methods evaluation approach.

作者信息

Popp Johanna, Grüne Eva, Carl Johannes, Semrau Jana, Pfeifer Klaus

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 15;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00699-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Co-creation strategies, such as cooperative planning, are promising as a means to ensure that physical activity interventions address real-world problems and are tailored to the target group. This has already been validated in diverse settings. However, questions targeting the transferability of cooperative planning to new settings and the key factors influencing its success or failure remain unclear. At the same time, co-creation processes are complex, and evaluation can be challenging. Following calls for detailed reporting, this paper describes the programme activities, the underlying logic, and methodological design of a study that aims to evaluate the transfer of cooperative planning to new settings and to explore the associated key determinants.

METHODS

Cooperative planning was utilized as a strategy to target physical activity promotion in three real-world German settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. This involved researchers working alongside stakeholders from practice and policy to conjointly develop new interventions to promote physical activity in physically demanding jobs. A pragmatic approach is used to evaluate both the transferability and key determinants of this strategy. We developed a logic model for this co-creation process that describes the underlying assumptions and guides the evaluation. The evaluation outcomes of this study include planning meetings, newly developed interventions, and the determinants that are likely to affect cooperative planning. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected using questionnaires, documents, and interviews. The quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, while the qualitative data will mainly be analysed using qualitative content analysis, split by settings. Subsequently, data triangulation will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings, which will then be compared across all three settings.

DISCUSSION

The study findings will contribute to a better understanding of co-creation strategies, their transferability, and key determinants. The practical implications can include a checklist for assessing key determinants and a guideline for transferring cooperative planning into new settings to benefit more people. Ultimately, this study will help to advance co-creation strategies and may be relevant for researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers targeting physical activity promotion in various contexts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/r6xnt/ (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

共同创造策略,如合作规划,有望确保体育活动干预措施解决现实世界的问题并针对目标群体进行定制。这已经在不同环境中得到验证。然而,针对合作规划向新环境的可转移性以及影响其成败的关键因素的问题仍不明确。同时,共同创造过程复杂,评估可能具有挑战性。在呼吁进行详细报告之后,本文描述了一项研究的项目活动、基本逻辑和方法设计,该研究旨在评估合作规划向新环境的转移,并探索相关的关键决定因素。

方法

合作规划被用作一种策略,以在德国护理和汽车机电一体化领域的三个现实环境中促进体育活动。这涉及研究人员与来自实践和政策领域的利益相关者合作,共同开发新的干预措施,以促进体力要求较高工作中的体育活动。采用务实的方法来评估该策略的可转移性和关键决定因素。我们为这个共同创造过程开发了一个逻辑模型,该模型描述了基本假设并指导评估。本研究的评估结果包括规划会议、新开发的干预措施以及可能影响合作规划的决定因素。将使用问卷、文件和访谈收集定量和定性数据。定量数据将进行描述性分析,而定性数据将主要使用定性内容分析进行分析,并按环境进行划分。随后,将使用数据三角剖分来整合定量和定性结果,然后在所有三个环境中进行比较。

讨论

研究结果将有助于更好地理解共同创造策略、其可转移性和关键决定因素。实际意义可能包括评估关键决定因素的清单以及将合作规划转移到新环境中以使更多人受益的指南。最终,本研究将有助于推进共同创造策略,可能对在各种背景下促进体育活动的研究人员、从业者和政策制定者具有相关性。

试验注册

开放科学框架:https://osf.io/r6xnt/(追溯注册)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b384/7962217/4900b8285daa/12961_2021_699_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验