Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology , Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 3;36(3):103-109. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1885722. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of newly developed preservative-free (PF) brimonidine/timolol fixed-combination (BTFC) ophthalmic solutions and a preservative-containing (PC) BTFC ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma.: This study was conducted as a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF BTFC as compared with PC BTFC in adult patients (aged ≥ 19 years) with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). A total of the 106 patients were enrolled, with 53 patients each randomized to the two treatment groups and included in the analysis of the safety set (SS).After a washout period, patients with an IOP below 35 mmHg at 9 a.m. were enrolled. After a full ophthalmic and glaucoma examination, a total of 106 OAG and OHT patients were randomized to the PF group or PC group.All subjects were examined 4 and 12 weeks after first administration. At each follow-up visit, IOP was measured at 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. and the efficacy, safety, and compliance were evaluated. Throughout the study, all adverse events were recorded and monitored by the investigators. The mean IOP changes from baseline to 12 weeks at 11:00 a.m. were -3.45 ± 2.53 mmHg in the PF group and -3.65 ± 2.76 mmHg in the PC group ( < .0001 for both). The difference in mean IOP change between the two groups was 0.20 ± 2.65 mmHg, which was not significantly different. The proportion of patients with IOP reductions of ≥ 15% and ≥ 20% and IOP at all-time points in the PF group were not significantly different when compared with in the PC group. There were no specific differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of adverse events. PF BTFC ophthalmic solution shows a similar efficacy and safety profile to that of PC BTFC.
: 比较新开发的无防腐剂(PF)溴莫尼定/噻吗洛尔固定组合(BTFC)滴眼液和含防腐剂(PC)BTFC 滴眼液在开角型青光眼患者中的疗效和安全性。: 这项研究是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、平行组临床试验,旨在评估 PF BTFC 与 PC BTFC 相比在成年开角型青光眼(OAG)和高眼压症(OHT)患者中的疗效和安全性。共有 106 名患者入组,其中 53 名患者随机分为两组,并纳入安全性集(SS)进行分析。在洗脱期后,上午 9 点 IOP 低于 35mmHg 的患者入组。在全面的眼科和青光眼检查后,共有 106 名 OAG 和 OHT 患者被随机分配到 PF 组或 PC 组。所有受试者在首次给药后 4 周和 12 周进行检查。在每次随访时,上午 9 点和 11 点测量 IOP,并评估疗效、安全性和依从性。在整个研究过程中,所有不良事件均由研究者记录和监测。上午 11 点时,从基线到 12 周的平均 IOP 变化在 PF 组为-3.45±2.53mmHg,在 PC 组为-3.65±2.76mmHg(均<.0001)。两组间平均 IOP 变化的差异为 0.20±2.65mmHg,无统计学意义。与 PC 组相比,PF 组的 IOP 降低≥15%和≥20%的患者比例以及所有时间点的 IOP 均无显著差异。两组间不良反应发生率无特异性差异。PF BTFC 滴眼液具有与 PC BTFC 滴眼液相似的疗效和安全性。