Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Sreet, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 21;42(20):2015-2018. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab133.
The link between viral respiratory infection and non-pulmonary organ-specific injury, including cardiac injury, has become increasingly appreciated during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even prior to the pandemic, however, the association between acute infection with influenza and elevated cardiovascular risk was evident. The recently published results of the NHLBI-funded INfluenza Vaccine to Effectively Stop CardioThoracic Events and Decompensated (INVESTED) trial, a 5200 patient comparative effectiveness study of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine to reduce cardiopulmonary events and mortality in a high-risk cardiovascular population, found no difference between strategies. However, the broader implications of influenza vaccine as a strategy to reduce morbidity in high-risk patients remain extremely important, with randomized controlled trial and observational data supporting vaccination in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease. Given a favourable risk-benefit profile and widespread availability at generally low cost, we contend that influenza vaccination should remain a centrepiece of cardiovascular risk mitigation and describe the broader context of underutilization of this strategy. Few therapeutics in medicine offer seasonal efficacy from a single administration with generally mild, transient side effects, and exceedingly low rates of serious adverse effects. Infection control measures such as physical distancing, hand washing, and the use of masks during the COVID-19 pandemic have already been associated with substantially curtailed incidence of influenza outbreaks across the globe. Appending annual influenza vaccination to these measures represents an important public health and moral imperative.
在当前的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,人们越来越认识到病毒性呼吸道感染与非肺部器官特异性损伤(包括心脏损伤)之间的联系。然而,即使在大流行之前,急性感染流感与心血管风险增加之间的关联也是显而易见的。最近发表的美国国立卫生研究院心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)资助的 INfluenza Vaccine to Effectively Stop CardioThoracic Events and Decompensated(INVESTED)试验结果,该试验是一项比较高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗在高危心血管人群中降低心肺事件和死亡率的 5200 例患者的比较有效性研究,发现两种策略之间没有差异。然而,流感疫苗作为降低高危患者发病率的策略的更广泛意义仍然非常重要,随机对照试验和观察性数据支持在心血管疾病高危患者中接种疫苗。鉴于其有利的风险效益状况和广泛的可用性,通常成本较低,我们认为流感疫苗接种应仍然是降低心血管风险的核心策略,并描述了这种策略未得到充分利用的更广泛背景。在医学中,很少有治疗方法能在单次给药后提供季节性疗效,且通常具有轻微、短暂的副作用,严重不良事件的发生率极低。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,诸如保持社交距离、勤洗手和戴口罩等感染控制措施已经与全球流感爆发的发病率大幅下降相关。将每年接种流感疫苗作为这些措施的补充,代表了一项重要的公共卫生和道德使命。