Suppr超能文献

进食障碍问卷(EDE-Q):沙特国民的有效性和常模。

Eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q): validity and norms for Saudi nationals.

机构信息

Novarum Center for Eating Disorders and Obesity, Jacob Obrechtstraat 92, 1071 KR, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

GGZ Rivierduinen, Sandifortdreef 18, 2333 ZZ, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Feb;27(1):139-150. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01150-3. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop an Arabic version of the EDE-Q and to assess its psychometric properties and utility as a screener in the Saudi population. An additional aim was to establish EDE-Q norms for Saudis.

METHOD

EDE-Q data were collected in a convenience sample of the Saudi community (N = 2690), of which a subset was also subjected to the EDE interview (N = 98). Various models for the factor structure were evaluated on their fit by CFA. With ROC analysis, the AUC was calculated to test how well the EDE-Q discriminated between Saudis at high and low risk for eating disorders.

RESULTS

The original four factor model of the EDE-Q was not supported. Best fit was found for a three factor model, including the weight/shape concern scale, dietary restraint scale and eating concern scale. The ROC analysis showed that the EDE-Q could accurately discriminate between individuals at high and low risk for an eating disorder according to the EDE interview. Optimal cut off of 2.93 on the global score yielded a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 80%. EDE-Q scores were fairly associated with BMI.

DISCUSSION

Psychometric characteristics of the Saudi version of the EDE-Q were satisfactory and results support the discriminant and convergent validity. Severity level of eating disorder pathology can be determined by the EDE-Q global score. Global scores were high compared to what is found in Western community samples, leading to high prevalence estimates for Saudis at high risk for eating disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable, empirical psychometric study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发阿拉伯版 EDE-Q,并评估其在沙特人群中的心理测量学特性和作为筛查工具的效用。另一个目的是为沙特人建立 EDE-Q 常模。

方法

在沙特社区的便利样本中收集了 EDE-Q 数据(N=2690),其中一小部分还接受了 EDE 访谈(N=98)。通过 CFA 评估各种因子结构模型的拟合度。通过 ROC 分析,计算 AUC 以测试 EDE-Q 如何区分沙特人患有饮食障碍的高风险和低风险。

结果

EDE-Q 的原始四因子模型不成立。最佳拟合度为三因子模型,包括体重/体型关注量表、饮食限制量表和进食关注量表。ROC 分析表明,根据 EDE 访谈,EDE-Q 可以准确区分饮食障碍高风险和低风险的个体。总分 2.93 的最佳截断值可获得 82%的敏感性和 80%的特异性。EDE-Q 分数与 BMI 相当相关。

讨论

沙特版 EDE-Q 的心理测量学特征令人满意,结果支持其判别和聚合效度。EDE-Q 总分可确定饮食障碍病理的严重程度。与西方社区样本中的发现相比,全球分数较高,导致沙特高危人群的饮食障碍患病率较高。

证据水平

不适用,经验心理测量学研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验