Complications Following One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Surgical Treatment of Transverse Maxillary Hypoplasia.

PURPOSE

Contemporary literature suggests a similar transverse stability of a surgical-assisted rapid palatal expansion and a segmented Le Fort I osteotomy. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications of 1-stage (segmental maxillary osteotomy) and 2-stage (surgical-assisted rapid palatal expansion followed by Le Fort I osteotomy) treated patients to determine the preferred treatment strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 74 consecutive patients (age range: 14 - 57 years; 36 males, 38 females) with a moderate transverse maxillary hypoplasia: 32 patients were treated in a 1-stage protocol and 42 in a 2-stage protocol with a postoperative follow-up of at least 1 year. Dental complications such as loss of teeth, gingival dehiscence, periodontal bone loss, apical root resorption, and surgical complications such as pain, hemorrhage, altered neurosensitivity, wound infection, aseptic necrosis were analyzed. Univariate analysis consisted of a generalized linear model with logit link or Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for group characteristics except for longer orthodontic treatment time in the 2-stage group. Incidence and severity of complications were comparable for the 1-stage and 2-stage patients. Only overall pain was significantly greater in the 2-stage patient group (P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering a similar complication rate and transversal stability, the choice between 1-stage and 2-stage approach for patients with a moderate transverse maxillary hypoplasia should be patient specific.