Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):599-603. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03306-8. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Terrestrial ecosystems remove about 30 per cent of the carbon dioxide (CO) emitted by human activities each year, yet the persistence of this carbon sink depends partly on how plant biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks respond to future increases in atmospheric CO (refs. ). Although plant biomass often increases in elevated CO (eCO) experiments, SOC has been observed to increase, remain unchanged or even decline. The mechanisms that drive this variation across experiments remain poorly understood, creating uncertainty in climate projections. Here we synthesized data from 108 eCO experiments and found that the effect of eCO on SOC stocks is best explained by a negative relationship with plant biomass: when plant biomass is strongly stimulated by eCO, SOC storage declines; conversely, when biomass is weakly stimulated, SOC storage increases. This trade-off appears to be related to plant nutrient acquisition, in which plants increase their biomass by mining the soil for nutrients, which decreases SOC storage. We found that, overall, SOC stocks increase with eCO in grasslands (8 ± 2 per cent) but not in forests (0 ± 2 per cent), even though plant biomass in grasslands increase less (9 ± 3 per cent) than in forests (23 ± 2 per cent). Ecosystem models do not reproduce this trade-off, which implies that projections of SOC may need to be revised.
陆地生态系统每年大约去除人类活动排放的二氧化碳 (CO) 的 30%,然而,这种碳汇的持久性部分取决于植物生物量和土壤有机碳 (SOC) 储量如何应对未来大气 CO 的增加 (参考文献)。尽管在升高 CO (eCO) 的实验中通常会增加植物生物量,但 SOC 的增加、不变甚至减少也有观测到。驱动这种实验间变化的机制仍知之甚少,这给气候预测带来了不确定性。在这里,我们综合了 108 个 eCO 实验的数据,发现 eCO 对 SOC 储量的影响可以通过与植物生物量的负相关关系来最好地解释:当 eCO 强烈刺激植物生物量时,SOC 储存会下降;相反,当生物量受到较弱刺激时,SOC 储存会增加。这种权衡似乎与植物养分获取有关,其中植物通过从土壤中获取养分来增加生物量,从而减少 SOC 储存。我们发现,总体而言,SOC 储量在草原中随 eCO 而增加 (8 ± 2%),但在森林中不增加 (0 ± 2%),尽管草原中的植物生物量增加幅度 (9 ± 3%)小于森林中的 (23 ± 2%)。生态系统模型无法再现这种权衡,这意味着对 SOC 的预测可能需要修订。