Suppr超能文献

联合药物治疗心力衰竭射血分数降低患者的心脏逆重构:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Combination pharmacotherapies for cardiac reverse remodeling in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

The Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, PR China; The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.

The Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res. 2021 Jul;169:105573. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105573. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

Pharmacotherapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), have played a pivotal role in reducing in-hospital and mortality in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, effects of the five drug categories used alone or in combination for cardiac reverse remodeling (CRR) in these patients have not been systematically evaluated. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted based on 55 randomized controlled trials published between 1989 and 2019 involving 12,727 patients from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020170457). Our primary outcomes were CRR indicators, including changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV), indexed LVEDV (LVEDVI) and LVESV (LVESVI), and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and end-systolic dimension (LVESD); Secondary outcomes were functional capacity comprising New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and 6-min walking distance (6MWD); cardiac biomarkers involving B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP). The effect sizes were presented as the mean difference with 95% credible intervals. According to the results, all dual-combination therapies except ACEI+ARB were significantly more associated with LVEF or NYHA improvement than placebo, ARB+BB and ARNI+BB were the top two effective dual-combinations in LVEF improvement (+7.59% [+4.27, +11.25] and +7.31% [+3.93, +10.97] respectively); ACEI+BB was shown to be superior to ACEI in reducing LVEDVI and LVESVI (-6.88 mL/m [-13.18, -1.89] and -10.64 mL/m [-18.73, -3.54] respectively); ARNI+BB showed superiority over ACEI+BB in decreasing the level of NT-proBNP (-240.11 pg/mL [-456.57, -6.73]). All tri-combinations were significantly more effective than placebo in LVEF improvement, and ARNI+BB+MRA ranked first (+21.13% [+14.34, +28.13]); ACEI+BB+MRA was significantly more associated with a decrease in LVEDD than ACEI (-6.57 mm [-13.10, -0.84]). A sensitivity analysis ignoring concomitant therapies for LVEF illustrated that all the five drug types except ARB were shown to be superior to placebo, and ARNI ranked first (+4.83% [+1.75, +7.99]). In conclusion, combination therapies exert more benefits on CRR for patients with HFrEF. Among them, ARNI+BB, ARB+BB, ARNI+BB+MRA and ARB+BB+MRA were the top two effective dual and triple combinations in LVEF improvement, respectively; The new "Golden Triangle" of ARNI+BB+MRA was shown to be superior to ACEI+BB+MRA or ARB+BB+MRA in LVEF improvement.

摘要

药物治疗,包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素受体 II 拮抗剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)、盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂-脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI),在降低射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的住院和死亡率方面发挥了关键作用。然而,这五类药物单独或联合用于这些患者的心脏逆重构(CRR)的效果尚未系统评估。根据 1989 年至 2019 年间发表的 55 项随机对照试验,我们进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,这些试验涉及来自 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Clinicaltrials.gov 的 12727 名患者。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020170457)上注册。我们的主要结局是 CRR 指标,包括左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)和收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)和收缩末期内径(LVESD)的变化;次要结局是包括纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)在内的功能能力;心脏生物标志物包括 B 型利钠肽(BNP)和 N 末端 pro-BNP(NT-proBNP)。效应大小以 95%可信区间表示的均数差表示。根据结果,除 ACEI+ARB 外,所有双联治疗与安慰剂相比,均能更显著地改善 LVEF 或 NYHA 分级,ARB+BB 和 ARNI+BB 是改善 LVEF 的两种最有效的双联组合(分别为+7.59%[+4.27,+11.25]和+7.31%[+3.93,+10.97]);与 ACEI 相比,ACEI+BB 降低 LVEDVI 和 LVESVI 的效果更好(分别为-6.88mL/m[-13.18,-1.89]和-10.64mL/m[-18.73,-3.54]);与 ACEI+BB 相比,ARNI+BB 降低 NT-proBNP 的水平更显著(-240.11pg/mL[-456.57,-6.73])。所有三联治疗与安慰剂相比,在改善 LVEF 方面均更有效,ARNI+BB+MRA 排名第一(+21.13%[+14.34,+28.13]);与 ACEI 相比,ACEI+BB 降低 LVEDD 的效果更显著(-6.57mm[-13.10,-0.84])。忽略 LVEF 伴随治疗的敏感性分析表明,除 ARB 外,所有五种药物类型均优于安慰剂,ARNI 排名第一(+4.83%[+1.75,+7.99])。总之,联合治疗对 HFrEF 患者的 CRR 更有益。其中,ARNI+BB、ARB+BB、ARNI+BB+MRA 和 ARB+BB+MRA 分别是改善 LVEF 的两种和三种最有效的联合治疗;新的“金三角”ARNI+BB+MRA 在改善 LVEF 方面优于 ACEI+BB+MRA 或 ARB+BB+MRA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验