Suppr超能文献

2012年至2017年美国医疗保险人群中心血管磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描的趋势

Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017.

作者信息

Goldfarb James W, Weber Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Research and Education, St Francis Hospital & Heart Center, 100 Port Washington Blvd, Roslyn, NY 11576.

出版信息

Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021 Feb 25;3(1):e200112. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200112. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the characteristics and trends of cardiovascular MRI and CT practitioners and practice in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2012-2017 Medicare Part B physician payments from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Supplier Public Use Files (POSPUF) was performed. Characteristics of cardiovascular MRI and CT, including the number of providers and examinations, provider sex and location, and physician reimbursement were analyzed. Variable means, standard deviations, and changes per year were reported and compared.

RESULTS

In 2017, 582 physicians provided cardiovascular MRI services in 45 states, a 16.6% increase from 2016 and an 84.8% increase from 2012. A total of 1645 physicians provided cardiovascular CT services in 49 states, a 14.2% increase from 2016 and a 77.3% increase from 2012. Of the providers, 18.0% and 13.3% of cardiovascular MRI and CT providers were women, respectively, similar to providers' respective medical specialties. Only 1.0% of radiologists and 0.2% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular MRI services. A total of 3.2% of radiologists and 0.5% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular CT services. Both cardiovascular MRI use (+75.5%) and cardiovascular CT use (+97.4%) increased markedly over the 6-year study period.

CONCLUSION

Although the availability of cardiovascular MRI and CT is increasing, both are used less frequently in comparison with other cardiovascular imaging modalities.See also the commentary by Bierhals in this issue.© RSNA, 2021.

摘要

目的

评估美国心血管磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)从业者的特点及实践趋势。

材料与方法

对2012 - 2017年医疗保险B部分医生支付情况进行回顾性横断面分析,数据来自提供者利用和支付数据医生及其他供应商公共使用文件(POSPUF)。分析了心血管MRI和CT的特点,包括提供者数量、检查数量、提供者性别和地点以及医生报销情况。报告并比较了变量均值、标准差和每年的变化情况。

结果

2017年,45个州的582名医生提供心血管MRI服务,较2016年增加了16.6%,较2012年增加了84.8%。共有1645名医生在49个州提供心血管CT服务,较2016年增加了14.2%,较2012年增加了77.3%。在提供者中,心血管MRI和CT提供者分别有18.0%和13.3%为女性,与各自医学专业的提供者情况相似。仅有1.0%的放射科医生和0.2%的心脏病专家提供心血管MRI服务。共有3.2%的放射科医生和0.5%的心脏病专家提供心血管CT服务。在6年研究期内,心血管MRI的使用量(增加75.5%)和心血管CT的使用量(增加97.4%)均显著增加。

结论

尽管心血管MRI和CT的可及性在增加,但与其他心血管成像方式相比,二者的使用频率较低。另见本期Bierhals的评论。© RSNA,2021。

相似文献

1
Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021 Feb 25;3(1):e200112. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2021200112. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Recent Trends in Medicare Reimbursements to Nonradiologist Physicians for In-Office MRI and CT.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jan;17(1 Pt B):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.07.009.
4
Gender variation in Medicare utilization and payments in gynecologic oncology.
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):602-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Variations in Medicare Reimbursement in Radiation Oncology: An Analysis of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Set.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Apr 1;94(5):1000-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.045. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
The Increasing Use of Emergency Department Imaging in the United States: Is It Appropriate?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):W180-W184. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21386. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
8
The Recent Losses in Medicare Imaging Revenues Experienced by Radiologists, Cardiologists, and Other Physicians.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Aug;14(8):1007-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.044. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Medicare Trends in Pathologist Participation, Service Utilization, and Payments.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Apr 26;155(5):674-679. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa167.

引用本文的文献

1
Democratizing cardiac imaging with an automated magnetic resonance exam.
Res Sq. 2025 Jul 18:rs.3.rs-6857034. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6857034/v1.
3
Highlights of the society for magnetic resonance angiography 2024 conference.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Mar 12;27(1):101878. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101878.
4
Impact of Zero Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Downstream Cardiac Testing and Cardiac Outcomes Compared With No Testing.
CJC Open. 2024 Nov 19;7(2):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.009. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Barriers to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scan performance and reporting by cardiologists: a systematic literature review.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Jan 22;3(1):qyaf010. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf010. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations toward environmentally sustainable cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101840. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101840. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
7
Changing Epidemiology of Myocarditis in Australia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7111. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237111.
8
Cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis and management.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 8;11:1394075. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1394075. eCollection 2024.
9
Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Oct;6(5):e240117. doi: 10.1148/ryct.240117.
10
Regional variability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance access and utilization in the United States.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101061. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

2
SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Nov 9;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00682-4.
3
Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1.
4
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
6
Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2418-2428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716734.
7
Variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial contouring: Insights from an international survey.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;50(4):1336-1338. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26689. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
8
INCA (Peru) Study: Impact of Non-Invasive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment in the Developing World.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 4;7(17):e008981. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008981.
9
Coronary CT Angiography: Reversal of Earlier Utilization Trends.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Feb;16(2):147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
10
Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 6;379(10):924-933. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805971. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验