Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA; Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219 USA.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213 USA.
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1440-1449. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Psychological comorbidities are important prognostic factors for low back pain (LBP). To develop improved treatment paradigms, it is first necessary to characterize and determine current patterns of treatment in this population.
Identify how comorbid depression or anxiety in patients with LBP is related to use of healthcare resources.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from outpatient offices at a large multisite academic medical center.
Data from 513,088 unique patients seen between January 2010 and July 2020 (58.0% female, 52.6±19.5 years) with a diagnosis of LBP, indicated by predetermined ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes.
Average self-reported pain scores, absolute differences and unadjusted risk ratios to compare opioid use, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, advanced imaging orders, spinal injections, and back surgeries between cohorts.
Clinical characteristics and data regarding use of healthcare resources were extracted from the electronic health record. Clinical features and patterns in healthcare utilization were determined for patients with depression or anxiety compared to those without.
Depression or anxiety was coded for 21.4% of patients at first LBP visit. Those with depression or anxiety were more likely to be on opioids (unadjusted risk ratio: 1.22, CI: [1.22,1.23]), go to the emergency department (1.31 [1.30-1.33]), be hospitalized (1.15 [1.13, 1.17]), receive advanced imaging (1.09 [1.08, 1.11]), receive an epidural steroid injection (1.16 [1.15, 1.18]), and less likely to have back surgery (0.74 [0.72, 0.77]). Differences in pain scores for those with depression/anxiety compared to those without were not clinically significant.
Depression/anxiety is associated with increased use of healthcare resources, and is not associated with clinically meaningful elevated pain scores. Limitations come from use of an aggregate data set and reliance on administrative coding.
心理合并症是腰痛(LBP)的重要预后因素。为了开发改进的治疗模式,首先有必要对该人群的特征和当前治疗模式进行描述和确定。
确定 LBP 患者的合并抑郁或焦虑与使用医疗保健资源之间的关系。
研究设计/背景:这是一项使用大型多地点学术医疗中心门诊办公室电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究。
2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月期间就诊的 513,088 例独特患者的数据(58.0%为女性,52.6±19.5 岁),这些患者的 LBP 通过预定的 ICD-9 和 ICD-10 代码进行诊断。
平均自我报告的疼痛评分、绝对差异和未调整的风险比,用于比较两个队列之间阿片类药物的使用、急诊就诊、住院、高级影像学检查、脊柱注射和背部手术。
从电子健康记录中提取临床特征和医疗资源使用情况的数据。与没有抑郁或焦虑的患者相比,确定了有抑郁或焦虑的患者的临床特征和医疗保健利用模式。
首次就诊时,有 21.4%的患者被诊断为抑郁或焦虑。与没有抑郁或焦虑的患者相比,有抑郁或焦虑的患者更有可能使用阿片类药物(未调整的风险比:1.22,CI:[1.22,1.23])、去急诊(1.31 [1.30-1.33])、住院(1.15 [1.13,1.17])、接受高级影像学检查(1.09 [1.08,1.11])、接受硬膜外类固醇注射(1.16 [1.15,1.18]),并且接受背部手术的可能性较小(0.74 [0.72,0.77])。有抑郁/焦虑的患者与没有抑郁/焦虑的患者相比,疼痛评分的差异无临床意义。
抑郁/焦虑与医疗保健资源的使用增加有关,与临床意义上的疼痛评分升高无关。局限性来自于使用综合数据集和对行政编码的依赖。